1993
DOI: 10.1006/adnd.1993.1003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roothaan-Hartree-Fock Ground-State Atomic Wave Functions: Slater-Type Orbital Expansions and Expectation Values for Z = 2-54

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
259
0
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 459 publications
(274 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
259
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important basic input for evaluating all these potentials is the charge density of the target. We have used the atomic charge density derived from the Hartree-Fock wave functions of Bunge et al [31]. The e-molecule system is more complex as compared to the e-atom system.…”
Section: High-energy Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most important basic input for evaluating all these potentials is the charge density of the target. We have used the atomic charge density derived from the Hartree-Fock wave functions of Bunge et al [31]. The e-molecule system is more complex as compared to the e-atom system.…”
Section: High-energy Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of CH 3 and OH, we reduce the system to single center by expanding the charge density of the lighter hydrogen atoms at the center of the heavier carbon or oxygen atom by employing the Bessel function expansion given in Gradshetyn and Ryzhik [34]. The spherically averaged molecular charge density ρ(r) is determined from the constituent atomic charge density using the Hartree-Fock wave functions of Bunge et al [31]. The molecular charge density ρ(r) so obtained is renormalized to incorporate the covalent bonding [35].…”
Section: High-energy Formalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the results here reported can be visualized in Figure A where we plot the relative error (in %) of our ground state energy with respect to the HF one [2] as compared to the relative error of the numerical solution [6]. In the present work the relative error is nearly constant for all the atoms considered.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For the Slater-type orbitals we have used the same values of M l and {n j l } in equations (10) and (11) respectively as in the Roothaan-Hartree-Fock solution of Ref. [2]. With respect to the parameterization of the effective potential the number of basis functions used to expand the effective potential is incremented systematically until convergence is reached.…”
Section: Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation