2018
DOI: 10.1049/iet-epa.2017.0858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rotor position estimation scheme with harmonic ripple attenuation for sensorless controlled permanent magnet synchronous motors

Abstract: To achieve high-performance sensorless control of permanent magnet motors with non-sinusoidal back electromotive force (EMF), an improved sliding mode observer (SMO) adopting synchronous rotating low-pass filter (SRLPF) is proposed. The SRLPF is utilised to reduce the back-EMF harmonics and extract the fundamental component. Different from the traditional rotor position observer, the proposed observer can calculate the rotor position with the back-EMF fundamental component. Owing to the decrease in the influen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where ω c is the desired bandwidth of PLL. As analysed in [20] and described in (6), θ d is the function of the inductance ratio (L q /L d ) and rotor speed multiplied by the ZVV duration (ω e t p ). With a small inductance ratio and ω e t p , θ d approaches π/2 rad.…”
Section: Estimation Of Rotor Position and Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where ω c is the desired bandwidth of PLL. As analysed in [20] and described in (6), θ d is the function of the inductance ratio (L q /L d ) and rotor speed multiplied by the ZVV duration (ω e t p ). With a small inductance ratio and ω e t p , θ d approaches π/2 rad.…”
Section: Estimation Of Rotor Position and Speedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase reliability and reduce cost, various advanced sensorless control structures have been proposed to remove the encoder in the drive system [1][2][3]. In general, the rotor position is obtained based on current measurements in these schemes [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is satisfied can guarantee the stability of the SMSC, where ρ max is the maximum disturbance estimation error. It can be seen from (22) and (26) that ε 2 is much smaller than ε 2 and therefore, it can dramatically reduce the chattering without increasing convergence time. Since the disturbance can provide a feed-forward to the SMSC to enhance its response speed and reduce the chattering, a disturbance observer with fast observation speed is designed as follows.…”
Section: Design Of Smscmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed method can effectively extract the fundamental of the back EMF from the SMO without introducing any phase lag at the centre frequency [21]. Similar to the SFE, Lu et al [22] proposed an improved SMO adopting synchronous rotating low-pass filter. However, both algorithms are computationally intensive and sensitive to speed variations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a) LPF delay The conventional SMO uses the signum function as the switching function [22]- [24], leading to inevitable chattering phenomenon when the system states go through the sliding surface (SS) from one side to the other. In order to attenuate the adverse effect of chattering on the accuracy of position calculation, the LPFs with fixed or variable cut-off frequency are commonly adopted [23], [24]. However the inherent delay attribute of the LPFs would bring about errors between the real and estimated values.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%