1974
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(74)90157-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Rough silicon surfaces studied by optical methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We attribute diameter-dependent reflectance to the surface roughness, which influences light trapping significantly. 24,25 Physically speaking, the rough surface reduces the reflectance by increasing the frequency of reflected light bouncing back from the back surface, rather than out to the surrounding air. 26 Under the assumption that Si NRAs are a cylinder array for simplicity, the root mean square roughness ͑␦ rms ͒ can be represented by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We attribute diameter-dependent reflectance to the surface roughness, which influences light trapping significantly. 24,25 Physically speaking, the rough surface reduces the reflectance by increasing the frequency of reflected light bouncing back from the back surface, rather than out to the surrounding air. 26 Under the assumption that Si NRAs are a cylinder array for simplicity, the root mean square roughness ͑␦ rms ͒ can be represented by…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with the rms values of the heights equal to several tens or hundreds nanometers) with a wide interval of spatial frequencies [1][2][3][4][5][6]. In this case it is not possible to use simple models of this roughness employed within the known theories of the interaction of light with rough surfaces that have been utilized so far (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(2) will be presented elsewhere. The reflectance of the rough GaAs surface covered with the triple layer has been expressed as [1,2]:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slightly rough surface was prepared by anodic oxidation and following dissolution the anodic oxide layer (AOL) formed. The detailed technological procedure of the preparation of rough silicon surfaces is described in paper [13]. Finally, all the surfaces, of both the samples, were covered by the same NOL, because the NOL, originally present on the smooth surfaces [14] and transmittance T for the smooth silicon wafer: TAB -calculated using the optical constants from Refs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%