1992
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.68.859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Roughness and giant magnetoresistance in Fe/Cr superlattices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
142
0
1

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 410 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
142
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the structure and interface properties can be well characterized by high-resolution X-ray diffraction and low-angle X-ray reflectometry in a non-destructive manner. In fact, the influence of the interface roughness on the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) of ferromagnetic/non-magnetic metal superlattices has been extensively studied by low-angle X-ray reflectometry [18]. Recently, Jo et al [19] claimed that the transport properties and magnetoresistance in La 0.7 Ca 0.3 MnO 3 /SrTiO 3 superlattices may be related to an inhomogeneous magnetic structure in the manganite layers having magnetically disordered interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the structure and interface properties can be well characterized by high-resolution X-ray diffraction and low-angle X-ray reflectometry in a non-destructive manner. In fact, the influence of the interface roughness on the giant magnetoresistance (GMR) of ferromagnetic/non-magnetic metal superlattices has been extensively studied by low-angle X-ray reflectometry [18]. Recently, Jo et al [19] claimed that the transport properties and magnetoresistance in La 0.7 Ca 0.3 MnO 3 /SrTiO 3 superlattices may be related to an inhomogeneous magnetic structure in the manganite layers having magnetically disordered interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, suppression of AF coupling may not necessarily lead to enhanced GMR at elevated pressure because of differing effects that can result from modification of interface roughness. An increase in roughness enhanced GMR in DC-magnetron sputtered Fe/Cr [17] but suppressed GMR in molecular beam epitaxy Fe/Cr were observed [18]. The involved structure in the present case has lower GMR (50.5 %) at 2 GPa than at ambient pressure (54.0 %) [13], showing that the principle mechanism is interface scattering.…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The role of disorder effects, in particular of roughness or interdiffusion across the interface, is still poorly understood and systematic investigations of these effects are lacking. Thus straightforward attempts to correlate important effects such as magnetoresistance, exchange bias and magnetic proximity effects with quantities such as the average roughness appear to show rather contradictory results [89,90]. In the case of exchange bias, for instance, there has been a steady progression of theoretical models to account for the discrepancies between the experimentally realized values and those expected from the most idealized model of the interface.…”
Section: Magnetic Vs Structural Roughnessmentioning
confidence: 99%