2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2021.106211
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ru nanoparticles supported on partially reduced TiO2 as highly efficient catalyst for hydrogen evolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atomic percentage of element of Ti in TiO 2 -Pt/C is about 9 atom %, while that of Ni, Ce, and W in their MO x -Pt/C catalysts is as low as 1.4 atom %, 1.0 atom %, and 2.0 atom %, respectively. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of MO x -Pt/C catalysts and Pt/C (Figure c–d and Figure S12) reveals that the binding energy (BE) of Pt 4f electrons in TiO 2 -Pt/C slightly downshifts 0.2 eV to low energy relative to that in Pt/C, implying that there is electron transfer from TiO 2 to Pt due to the electronic interaction between TiO 2 and Pt. , Similar downshifting of the BE in Pt 4f also exists in other MO x -Pt/C catalysts as shown in Figure S12. However, we cannot ascribe the HER improvement only to such a small change in the electronic configuration of Pt after the metal oxides decoration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The atomic percentage of element of Ti in TiO 2 -Pt/C is about 9 atom %, while that of Ni, Ce, and W in their MO x -Pt/C catalysts is as low as 1.4 atom %, 1.0 atom %, and 2.0 atom %, respectively. The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) of MO x -Pt/C catalysts and Pt/C (Figure c–d and Figure S12) reveals that the binding energy (BE) of Pt 4f electrons in TiO 2 -Pt/C slightly downshifts 0.2 eV to low energy relative to that in Pt/C, implying that there is electron transfer from TiO 2 to Pt due to the electronic interaction between TiO 2 and Pt. , Similar downshifting of the BE in Pt 4f also exists in other MO x -Pt/C catalysts as shown in Figure S12. However, we cannot ascribe the HER improvement only to such a small change in the electronic configuration of Pt after the metal oxides decoration.…”
mentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Interface effect refers to the interface between two types of active materials due to strong bonding, electronic interaction or synergistic effect, which can form more active centers than individual components. [ 250 , 251 , 252 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 257 , 258 , 259 , 260 , 261 , 262 , 263 , 264 , 265 , 266 , 267 , 268 , 269 ] The complex electronic structures of interfacial electrocatalysts make the fundamental investigations of structure‐activity relationships still remain as a great challenge. Nevertheless, this complexity also introduces various structural features that can be adjusted advantageously.…”
Section: Strategies To Improve Her Electrocatalystsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, numerous researchers made innovations in making novel catalysts to enhance the electrocatalytic processes and some of these novel catalysts recently reported are listed in Table 5 . Another novel catalyst using reduced titanium dioxide-supported ruthenium nanocatalyst was developed with more oxygen vacancies for hydrogen evolution (Chen et al 2021b ). This nanocatalyst required very less overpotential (15 mV) to deliver the current density of 10 mA cm −2 under alkaline conditions.…”
Section: Applications Of Titanium Dioxidementioning
confidence: 99%