Rule of Law and Human Rights Challenges in South East Asia: A Case Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia

Tegnan, Gbohou Gnantin Hilaire; Isra, Saldi

doi:10.2139/ssrn.2836333

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To carry out the execution is not a simple task, and to carry out the execution of the Industrial Relations Court's decision requires a lengthy period of time and procedure. Numerous factors impede the implementation of the Industrial Relations Court's decision, including the lack of good faith from the executing respondent (company) to implement the decision voluntarily and the frequent use of flimsy excuses to delay the implementation of the decision, as well as the inability of the execution applicant (worker) to report what goods or assets of the executing respondent (company) will be executed (Clarke, 2012;Littlejohn, 2020;Tegnan & Isra, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Execution of Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht)

Ritonga

Fitrian

Hendro

2022

POLRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The research will discuss the execution of industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force, aiming to reveal and analyze how the process of implementing industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force and what factors hinder the execution of industrial relations court decisions with permanent legal force. This is a literature study using normative legal research. The data collected by library research, namely by the study of written information about the law that comes from various sources and is widely published and is needed in normative legal research. The findings highlight that the procedure for the execution of industrial relations court decisions that have permanent legal force has not been explicitly regulated in Law Number 2 of 2004 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. However, Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement confirms that the Industrial Relations Court applies procedural law applicable to civil procedural law within the General Courts as stated in Article 57 of Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement. The lack of good faith on the part of the losing party to voluntarily carry out their obligations as stated in the verdict is one of the factors impeding the execution of the Industrial Relations Court's decision, which has permanent legal force. In addition, it is difficult for the winning party, in this case the workers, to determine which company assets can be executed against the losing party, and the execution cost is too high for the court to issue an execution order.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Execution of Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht)

Ritonga

Fitrian

Hendro

2022

POLRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The fact that Indonesia is a nation based on the rule of law necessitates that every citizen's actions and behavior must be in accordance with the state's stipulations and regulations (Tegnan & Isra, 2016). When discussing legal issues, someone will encounter issues pertaining to the social activities of human life in society, which are manifested as a process of interaction and interrelationship between one human and another in social life.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sinabang District Court Law Enforcement Efforts Against Four-Wheel Vehicle Embezzlement in Simeulue Regency

Sari

Basri

2022

POLRI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Embezzlement in the Criminal Code is classified as a crime. The embezzlement is contained in Article 372 of the Criminal Code. The focus of this research is on law enforcement in dealing with criminal acts of embezzlement as well as inhibiting factors in law enforcement in handling criminal acts of embezzlement. Based on the results of research and discussion, it shows that law enforcement in handling criminal acts of embezzlement is carried out by means of crime prevention and prevention methods. The prevention approach is carried out through counseling and socialization in order to foster social responsibility for the residents of Simeulue Regency against the crime of embezzling four-wheeled vehicles. Legal counseling is especially carried out in areas prone to crime. The criminal approach is carried out through efforts to enforce the law of the Simeulue district in order to ensure that the perpetrators of the crime of embezzlement are legally processed in order to obtain criminal sanctions and guarantee legal certainty. Factors causing embezzlement of four-wheeled vehicles against law enforcement in handling criminal acts of embezzlement include: criminal sanctions in Article 372 of the Criminal Code that have not provided a deterrent effect, limited law enforcement agencies, limited state special budgets for law enforcement, lack of public awareness of the importance of understanding crime, society becomes a crime.

show abstract

Marginalisasi Hukum Adat pada Masyarakat Adat The marginalization of adat law on adat communities

Suartina¹

2020

JMB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tulisan ini berupaya melihat marjinalisasi adat, hukum adat serta implikasinya pada masyarakat adat. Dalam konteks Indonesia, meskipun Konstitusi dan beberapa aturan formal mengakui masyarakat adat, termasuk pranata adat, namun pada praktiknya telah terjadi upaya peminggiran jangka panjang. Ketidakkonsistenan kebijakan negara terhadap penerapan hukum adat memberikan peran dalam marjinalisasi komunitas adat pada berbagai tingkat. Melalui penelitian lapangan di tiga komunitas adat, Kasepuhan Ciptagelar, Kasepuhan Karang dan Kasepuhan Guradog di bagian Barat Jawa serta perspektif pluralism hukum, tulisan ini menjelaskan kurangnya pengakuan pada hukum adat memberikan pengaruh tertentu pada masyarakat adat, termasuk dalam pengaturan kemasyarakatan dan penghidupan. Studi ini pun membuktikan bahwa meskipun hukum adat secara praktis tidak diadopsi oleh negara, dalam beberapa kasus, masyarakat adat menemukan strategi untuk mempertahankan keyakinan dan praktik hukum adat di komunitasnya. Untuk itu, dalam konteks lebih luas, hal yang ingin disampaikan adalah, upaya marjinalisasi tidak mampu menghapuskan praktik adat dan hukum adat secara keseluruhan. Ketiga kasus memperlihatkan hingga saat ini praktik multi sistem hukum di masyarakat plural seperti Indonesia masih diterapkan, baik dalam situasi konflik maupun berdampingan. Selain itu, dalam mendiskusikan implementasi hukum di Indonesia dari perspektif masyarakat, pembedaan sistem formal dan informal di masyarakat tetap diperlukan dan unifikasi hukum hanya berfungsi dalam batas tertentu.This paper attempts to see adat and adat law marginalizations, and the implications on adat peoples. In Indonesia, despite the recognition for adat peoples in the Constitution and formal rules, including adat institutions, in practice there has been a long-term marginalization. The inconsistent State’s policies towards the adat law application play a role in the marginalization of adat communities at various levels. Having field research in Ciptagelar, Karang and Guradog kasepuhan communities in western Java and legal pluralism perspective, this paper elucidates the lack of adat law recognition giving certain impacts on adat peoples, including on their social lives and livelihood. This study also proves that although adat law is not practically adopted by the State, in some cases, adat peoples find strategies to maintain their beliefs and adat law. Thus, in a broader context, the marginalization is unable to eliminate adat and adat law as a whole. To date the practice of multi-legal systems in a plural society, such as Indonesia, still takes place, both in conflict and coexistence. Moreover, in discussing Indonesia’s implementation of law from a community perspective, the distinction between formal and informal systems is still needed and legal unification only functions within certain limits

show abstract

Rule of Law and Human Rights Challenges in South East Asia: A Case Study of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia

Cited by 3 publications

References 4 publications

Execution of Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht)

Execution of Decisions of the Industrial Relations Court With Permanent Legal Force (Inkracht)

Sinabang District Court Law Enforcement Efforts Against Four-Wheel Vehicle Embezzlement in Simeulue Regency

Marginalisasi Hukum Adat pada Masyarakat Adat The marginalization of adat law on adat communities

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About