1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1522-2594(199908)42:2<371::aid-mrm19>3.0.co;2-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safe electrical stimulation of the cochlear nerve at the promontory during functional magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is clearly demonstrated in Figure 4, and is equally evident in the IR-EPI images of Figure 5, where there is no distortion evident in the right temporal lobe, despite the presence of the transtympanic electrode in the right ear. This is in marked contrast to studies in which a local current source is used, where information from much of the ipsilateral cortex is lost (9). This is especially unfortunate, given the interesting preliminary findings concerning the lateralization of auditory responses in deaf subjects (see below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is clearly demonstrated in Figure 4, and is equally evident in the IR-EPI images of Figure 5, where there is no distortion evident in the right temporal lobe, despite the presence of the transtympanic electrode in the right ear. This is in marked contrast to studies in which a local current source is used, where information from much of the ipsilateral cortex is lost (9). This is especially unfortunate, given the interesting preliminary findings concerning the lateralization of auditory responses in deaf subjects (see below).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A preliminary study by the team that published the earlier PET studies served to demonstrate the feasibility of the fMRI approach, but was restricted to single-slice acquisition at modest (15 seconds) temporal resolution (7), and did not address the potential hazards associated with electrical stimulation (8). A safe, MR-compatible method for electrical stimulation at the promontory has been developed, based on a fiber-optic connection from a commercial promontory stimulator and a local battery-powered current source supplying the needle electrode (9). Unfortunately, the current source, which is attached to the subject's head, results in a large signal void covering much of the ipsilateral frontal region.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent use of deep brain electrical stimulation in human fMRI studies shows that it should be possible to perform safe functional MR imaging by modifying not only the tip region of the electrode, but also the arrangement of the electrodes, connecting wires, and coil (Gleason et al, 1992;Berthezene et al, 1997;Obler et al, 1999;Tronnier et al, 1999;Alwatban et al, 2002;Rezai et al, 2002). One of the concerns about MR compatibility is the interaction between the electrode and the time-varying magnetic field in the presence of a conducting loop (Tenforde, 1986).…”
Section: Electrode Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our experimental set-up, the induced current was minimized by decreasing the area of the conducting loop, and the conducting loop was arranged approximately parallel to the B1 field and so should induce a lower voltage within the RF field. In addition, the impedance of the carbon fiber electrode was approximately 1 M , higher than those for conventional electrodes, making it possible to reduce the induced electrical current (Obler et al, 1999).…”
Section: Electrode Interferencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation