2018
DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2018.1443536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety and feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis – a pilot study with a single subject experimental design

Abstract: This case study demonstrates the safety and feasibility of long-term facilitatory and inhibitory tDCS on a single participant with ALS. This study serves as a guideline for implementing tDCS in future ALS trials.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the only study (94) in which cathodal tDCS of M1 was delivered for a prolonged time in a single subject, no effect on disease progression was observed. This was also the case of a single patient reported by Madhavan et al (96), treated for 4-week periods with either anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS, and of two patients reported by Sivaramakrishnan et al (97), treated for 8 weeks with anodal tDCS of M1. The latter study also evaluated the feasibility of remotely supervised treatment, with therapists guiding caregivers through internet in the application of tDCS and reporting of adverse events.…”
Section: Non-invasive Electrical Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the only study (94) in which cathodal tDCS of M1 was delivered for a prolonged time in a single subject, no effect on disease progression was observed. This was also the case of a single patient reported by Madhavan et al (96), treated for 4-week periods with either anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS, and of two patients reported by Sivaramakrishnan et al (97), treated for 8 weeks with anodal tDCS of M1. The latter study also evaluated the feasibility of remotely supervised treatment, with therapists guiding caregivers through internet in the application of tDCS and reporting of adverse events.…”
Section: Non-invasive Electrical Stimulationsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The 1-Hz rTMS showed promising results but it was tested only in a very preliminary study (87). Cathodal tDCS seems to be ineffective in preliminary observations (94,96,105), while a recent wider study suggests a functional effect of corticospinal tDCS (95) but limited by the fact that stimulation was applied only for 2 weeks (Table 1). Of note, with tDCS, individualized electric field modeling (192,193) could improve stimulation targeting and dosing of current density in target brain areas.…”
Section: Discussion and Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes of ALSFRS-R in both patients were monitored before cathodal tDCS and during the period of cortical stimulation, and it determined that changes were similar before and during cathodal tDCS. Other clinical trials investigated the utility of tDCS based around the similar methodologies [144,145]. One trial included a single ALS patient, applied 12 sessions each of anodal, sham and cathodal tDCS for 4 weeks and measured changes of ALSFRS-R and mobility.…”
Section: Non-pharmacological Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant effect of tDCS on SICI or ICF was demonstrated in either group. Madhavan et al 73 applied anodal, cathodal and sham tDCS over the motor cortex in a single subject safety pilot, with no reported adverse effects. While electrode montages were consistent between studies, the application of 2 mA current raises concerns about blinding, while the number and duration of sessions differed significantly.…”
Section: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%