2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Safety compliance and safety climate: A repeated cross-sectional study in the oil and gas industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study also shows that safety climate indicators have a predictive capacity in relation to accidents, not only at the group or organizational level, as employed by Zohar and those inspired by his work (6,7,9,21), but also at a population level, where each respondent's answers represent five safety climate dimensions of a group or organization. Our results in particular relate to employees engaged in work that requires basic-level skills and likely others as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The study also shows that safety climate indicators have a predictive capacity in relation to accidents, not only at the group or organizational level, as employed by Zohar and those inspired by his work (6,7,9,21), but also at a population level, where each respondent's answers represent five safety climate dimensions of a group or organization. Our results in particular relate to employees engaged in work that requires basic-level skills and likely others as well.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Numerous studies today explicitly or implicitly regard safety climate as a leading indicator capable of predicting safety outcomes (5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). However, research on safety climate as a leading indicator for accidents specifically is still limited, as most empirical studies are retrospective rather than prospective, as shown in a 2009 review by Payne et al (11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, this theme is divided into two different factors, one concerned with management commitment and the other with supervisor attitude. 5,7,14,17,18,26,29,35,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48] There are many questionnaires which included supervision as an individual factor, thus emphasizing the significance of supervisors in establishing and improving the workplace surroundings and consequently the SC for their activities. The skill of supervision in controlling the performance of workforce is a factor of the greatest importance in productive injury/accident prevention.…”
Section: Literature-based Themes and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workplace, workload, and WP, or production pressure, are very common themes in SC surveys, and for good reason. It has emerged only in a few previous studies as a separate theme, 5,17,26,29,[45][46][47]54,56 but a review of items clearly shows that it is a central issue, although the items may be included by factors like management/ supervision, worker's commitment, and so on. When time and resources become stretched, WP is very likely to influence the SC at the workplace.…”
Section: Wpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Likert scale (1-5) questionnaire has been developed to collect data for further analysis. A few Unsafe supervision [5,25] Lack of PPEs [15,21] Poor skill [23,26] Job Stress [18,27] Lack of safety training [28,29] Technical error [20,22] Operation error [30,31] Unsafe Process Design [24,32] Lack of rules and regulations [5,33] Design error [34,35] Inherent proneness [36,37] Poor physical environment [38,39] Poor safety culture [40,41] Poor behavior [42,43] Management issues [44,45] questions have been asked regarding demographics of the individuals in the questionnaire and then the questions regarding the mentioned factors have been asked. Questions have been carefully sketched and verified from the research experts.…”
Section: Questionnaire Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%