2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.0016-7363.2005.00674.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SANET: A Toolbox for Spatial Analysis on a Network

Abstract: JapanThis article shows a geographical information systems (GIS)-based toolbox for analyzing spatial phenomena that occur on a network (e.g., traffic accidents) or almost along a network (e.g., fast-food stores in a downtown). The toolbox contains 13 tools: random point generation on a network, the Voronoi diagram, the K-function and cross K-function methods, the unconditional and conditional nearest-neighbor distance methods, the Hull model, and preprocessing tools. The article also shows a few actual analyse… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
97
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
97
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In traditional analysis methods, it is generally assumed that the spatial events can be located stochastically on a plane, and the spatial association between event locations or sub-areas is analysed using the Euclidean (or planar) distance [1][2][3], in which the inherent spatial processes are quantified based the assumption of Euclidean geometry [4]. However, this assumption is not appropriate when a spatial phenomenon is apparently constrained to a subset of geographical space, such as a street network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In traditional analysis methods, it is generally assumed that the spatial events can be located stochastically on a plane, and the spatial association between event locations or sub-areas is analysed using the Euclidean (or planar) distance [1][2][3], in which the inherent spatial processes are quantified based the assumption of Euclidean geometry [4]. However, this assumption is not appropriate when a spatial phenomenon is apparently constrained to a subset of geographical space, such as a street network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A network version of K-function and its computational implementation are described in Okabe and Yamada (2001). To examine the advantages of network K-function, Yamada & Thill (2004) (Okabe et al, 2006). SANET offers network version of both global and local K-functions as well as some additional utility tools for data processing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18], that is, phenomena which do happen in points along edges of the network, such as, for instance, traffic accidents, or close to such edges, as happens in urban settings, where edges model the city streets, close to the buildings where demand happens. See [18,19] for further discussion on the advantages on continuous network models against traditional approaches (discrete or planar location models).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[18] suggests the use of general density distributions, from which random samples are generated, yielding a discrete approximation to the problem, which is the one which is later analyzed. Statistical kernel methods have also been recently proposed to model the demand, [20,23], though, as far as the authors know, no optimization has been carried out, excepting, as said above, discretization via simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%