1948
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.38.11.1532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sanitary Significance of Cocci in Swimming Pools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

1953
1953
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed there is strong evidence to the contrary. Eitter and Treece (1) showed that Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, and the enterococci were 5 to 20 times more resistant to chlorine than the coliform bacteria. Favero (2) and Favero and Drake (S) showed that S. aureus was relatively more resistant to chlorine than Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed there is strong evidence to the contrary. Eitter and Treece (1) showed that Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus salivarius, and the enterococci were 5 to 20 times more resistant to chlorine than the coliform bacteria. Favero (2) and Favero and Drake (S) showed that S. aureus was relatively more resistant to chlorine than Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common indicator of the quality of recreational water is the fecal coliform index. However, its usefulness in determining the safety of swimming pool waters has been debated for some time (Inhorn et al, 1973;Ritter and Treece, 1948). One advantage of the fecal coliform standard is that the organisms can be readily estimated using either the multiple-tube dilution method or the membrane filtration technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1916; Houston, 1910Houston, , 1931Houston, , 1932Ostrolenk, Kramer & Cleverdon, 1947;Ritter & Treece, 1948;Ingram, 1952;Allen, Grindley & Brooks, 1953) support the view that counts of Bacterium coli and Str. faecalis together probably constitute a better index of faecal pollution than examination for either organism alone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…faecalis nor even for streptococci (cf. France & Fuller, 1940;Ritter & Treece, 1948). Hannay & Norton (1947) used a glucose broth containing Enumeration of Streptococcus faecalis 0-025 % sodium azide and 0 3 % yeast extract, and a temperature of incubation of 450 C. for enumerating streptococci in river water.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%