2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2018.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SBF assays, direct and indirect cell culture tests to evaluate the biological performance of bioglasses and bioglass-based composites: Three paradigmatic cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason behind the drop-in performance in the long term (72 h) and in the second use group of assays based on eluate (BrdU and MTT) needs to be argued. Important discrepancies should be expected between the findings of the direct culture tests and those arising from the indirect ones [29]. To this aim, the materials' cytotoxicity has been investigated both through direct contact tests-where the cells are seeded directly onto the material and then incubated in suitable conditions-and indirect contact (eluate), in order to observe the possible negative effects of the samples' eluates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reason behind the drop-in performance in the long term (72 h) and in the second use group of assays based on eluate (BrdU and MTT) needs to be argued. Important discrepancies should be expected between the findings of the direct culture tests and those arising from the indirect ones [29]. To this aim, the materials' cytotoxicity has been investigated both through direct contact tests-where the cells are seeded directly onto the material and then incubated in suitable conditions-and indirect contact (eluate), in order to observe the possible negative effects of the samples' eluates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All samples underwent both direct (NR uptake) and indirect (extract, eluate) contacts for the cytocompatibility assays (MTT and BrdU, see below) [29].…”
Section: Assessment Of Cytocompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, bioactive glasses have shown high bioactivity and high interaction with hard and soft tissues [14,15]. In this work, 45S5 BG (composition 45 wt% SiO 2 , 24.5 wt% CaO, 24.5 wt% Na 2 O, and 6.0 wt% P 2 O 5 ) [16], Sr-and Mg-substituted bioactive glass (BGMS10 [17][18][19][20][21][22][23]), and Zn-substituted bioactive glass (BGMS_2Zn [24]) were incorporated in PCL fibers by electrospinning technique. BGMS10 was designed starting from the composition of 45S5 by adding SrO and MgO; subsequently, ZnO was added to the BGMS10 composition to produce a Zn-substituted bioactive glass labelled as BGMS_2Zn [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the addition of therapeutic ions such as strontium and magnesium resulted in an improved biological response [ 12 ] also compared to 45S5 [ 13 ], as reported as well for other bioactive glasses containing Sr and Mg [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. BGMS10 resulted as suitable for the preparation of composites [ 21 ], dental putties [ 22 ], 3D printed scaffolds [ 23 ], wound dressings [ 24 , 25 ], and antibacterial systems [ 26 ], being very promising also compared to other bioactive glasses investigated in literature (e.g., [ 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%