2013
DOI: 10.1039/c3tb00369h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling laws at the nanosize: the effect of particle size and shape on the magnetism and relaxivity of iron oxide nanoparticle contrast agents

Abstract: The magnetic properties of iron oxide nanoparticles govern their relaxivities and efficacy as contrast agents for MRI. These properties are in turn determined by their composition, size and morphology. Herein we present a systematic study of the effect of particle size and shape of magnetite nanocrystals synthesized by thermal decompositions of iron salts on both their magnetism and their longitudinal and transverse relaxivities, r1 and r2, respectively. Faceted nanoparticles demonstrate superior magnetism and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
115
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
8
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…MAR, motional averaging regime; SDR, static dephasing regime; ELR, echo-limiting regime. It is worth noting though that deviations to the proposed r 2 universal scaling law [135] have been reported for nanosystems presented with faceted [69] or nanoplate [136] morphology particles, thus, corroborating to the consequences of non-spherical particle shape, a parameter that has not been considered in the above model. In summary, upon the assembly of nanocrystals into clusters, features such as the size, magnetization, and inorganic phase volume fraction would determine the relaxivities ( Figure 20); however, other factors may also play a critical role.…”
Section: Nanoclusters As Contrast Agents In Magnetic Resonance Imaginmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…MAR, motional averaging regime; SDR, static dephasing regime; ELR, echo-limiting regime. It is worth noting though that deviations to the proposed r 2 universal scaling law [135] have been reported for nanosystems presented with faceted [69] or nanoplate [136] morphology particles, thus, corroborating to the consequences of non-spherical particle shape, a parameter that has not been considered in the above model. In summary, upon the assembly of nanocrystals into clusters, features such as the size, magnetization, and inorganic phase volume fraction would determine the relaxivities ( Figure 20); however, other factors may also play a critical role.…”
Section: Nanoclusters As Contrast Agents In Magnetic Resonance Imaginmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In summary, upon the assembly of nanocrystals into clusters, features such as the size, magnetization, and inorganic phase volume fraction would determine the relaxivities ( Figure 20); however, other factors may also play a critical role. For example, the size distribution [25], shape/morphology [69,136], and surface characteristics (the thickness of the surfactant layer, r 2~1 /L; its hydrophilicity) [131,137] are a few parameters for which the theoretical predictions are poorly accounting for. Further on, microscopic phenomena related to the nanocluster or the constituent nanocrystal (e.g.…”
Section: Nanoclusters As Contrast Agents In Magnetic Resonance Imaginmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An interesting feature observed in Figure 4 is that when NPs wrapped with a small molecule (as oxalate) are replaced by bigger ones (as the amino acids), magnetization increases, although a magnetization decrease was expected (same magnetic core, more non-magnetic organic wrap). Previous work shows that magnetic properties of NPs are strongly determined by NP size, where saturation magnetization increases with increasing crystal size until a size of 12 nm [37]. Magnetization measurements provide a weighted average of all the NPs dispersed in the solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 One important factor that can significantly affect the proton relaxivity value and has not received much attention is the spatial arrangement of nanoparticles in the infected tissue environment. Controlling the spatial distribution of nanoparticles, both with respect to their placement as isolated particles or particle agglomerates of different sizes in a three dimensional framework and then placement of this framework in the infected tissue environment, is relevant, as an optimal arrangement can significantly increase the proton relaxivity value in two possible ways: (a) by generating very high magnetic field gradients from the collective magnetic behaviour of individual nanoparticles in the framework 14,15 and (b) by optimally trapping the water protons within the three dimensional framework, such that a significant increase in the interaction between the water protons and the superparamagnetic nanoparticles along with a reasonable proton exchange rate is achieved. 16,17 One possible way by which the "spatial distribution" factor can be employed is by using a bio-compatible, hydrophilic and flexible substrate, such as graphene oxide 18 as the framework material on which superparamagnetic nanoparticles can be organized in a controlled manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%