2003
DOI: 10.1149/1.1567267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling of Roughness in Silver Electrodeposition

Abstract: The electrodeposition of silver from thiosulfate solutions and its surface roughness are studied using scaling methods. Although silver electrodeposition from photographic fixing baths containing thiosulfate has been done successfully for many years, the vast majority of information about this process remains empirical. A comparison is made between plating silver from ammonium-and sodium-thiosulfate-containing solutions. Atomic force microscopy is used to study surface roughness, which is then analyzed by scal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…indicates the standard deviation of a for each iron film prepared at different deposition time. Metals electrodeposited onto a foreign substrate surfaces in the additive free solutions typically exhibit a value between 0.7 and 1.0, for example, Cu = 0.8-0.9 [17,19], Ag = 0.7 [20], Ni = 0.9 [21] and NiP = 1.0 [22]. The present value of a = 0.35-1.1 is in the range of these parameters.…”
Section: Effect Of Magnetic Field On Scaling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…indicates the standard deviation of a for each iron film prepared at different deposition time. Metals electrodeposited onto a foreign substrate surfaces in the additive free solutions typically exhibit a value between 0.7 and 1.0, for example, Cu = 0.8-0.9 [17,19], Ag = 0.7 [20], Ni = 0.9 [21] and NiP = 1.0 [22]. The present value of a = 0.35-1.1 is in the range of these parameters.…”
Section: Effect Of Magnetic Field On Scaling Factorsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Silver was electrodeposited under potentiostatic control at a voltage of À0.3 V vs. a saturated calomel electrode (SCE). The electrolyte used consisted of AgBr (0.1 M), sodium sulfite (0.2 M) and sodium thiosulfate (0.25 M) in water [38].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value of ␣ is predicted for electrodeposits exhibiting a three-dimensional ͑3D͒ columnar type of surface morphology, 13 which is commonly seen in electrodeposition experiments producing polycrystalline deposits. [14][15][16] For l Ն l C , the surface width is constant, having its saturation value of w sat Ϸ 340 ± 7 nm ͑Fig. 2͒.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%