2014
DOI: 10.1002/sca.21154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning electron microscopy of bacteria Tetrasphaera duodecadis

Abstract: This study reports the characterization of the Tetrasphaera duodecadis bacteria and the techniques used therein. In order to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the T. duodecadis bacteria scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used throughout its different growth stages. These microorganisms were grown in vitamin B12 broths with 1% tryptone, 0.2% yeast extract, and 0.1% glucose. The turbidimetric method was employed for the determination of bacterial concentration and growth curve. The SEM results sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial endophytes LB‐132 taken from the NA medium were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% (v/v) in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.2), for 24 h at 4 °C; and then dehydrated by 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95% and 100% of ethanol (Song et al ., 2017). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) at 15.0 kV was used to observe the morphology of bacterial strains (Arroyo et al ., 2014). Fungal endophytes SF‐85 and RF‐1 taken from the PDA medium were noted, the conidia and conidial head of fungal isolates were observed with microscope (Smart, China) by lactophenol cotton blue stain (Zheng et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial endophytes LB‐132 taken from the NA medium were fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% (v/v) in a 0.1 M phosphate buffer solution (PBS, pH 7.2), for 24 h at 4 °C; and then dehydrated by 10%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 85%, 95% and 100% of ethanol (Song et al ., 2017). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, SU8010, Hitachi, Japan) at 15.0 kV was used to observe the morphology of bacterial strains (Arroyo et al ., 2014). Fungal endophytes SF‐85 and RF‐1 taken from the PDA medium were noted, the conidia and conidial head of fungal isolates were observed with microscope (Smart, China) by lactophenol cotton blue stain (Zheng et al ., 2017).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning electron microscopy was performed as described by Arroyo et al . 57 with slight modifications using the scanning electron microscope (SEM) (EFI Quanta 200 3D, USA). For biochemical characterization, various tests were conducted including carbohydrate fermentation (glucose, lactose, sucrose, mannitol, maltose, raffinose, sorbitol and starch), esculin and starch hydrolysis, indole, lysine decarboxylase, catalase and oxidase production, and Voges-Proskauer and methyl red tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial isolates were characterized by the observation of colony morphology, Gram reaction, and string and motility tests. Cell morphology was investigated using SEM (JSM-IT300, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) according to the protocol of Arroyo et al [ 29 ]. For biochemical identification, an evaluation of various tests was assessed, consisting of catalase, indole, lysine decarboxylase, lysine deaminase and cytochrome oxidase production, methyl red and Voges-Proskauer, nitrate reduction, citrate, triple sugar iron, gelatinase, urease and carbohydrate fermentation (including galactose, glucose, lactose, maltose, mannitol, mannose, rhamnose and sucrose) tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%