2006
DOI: 10.14214/sf.357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling forest road maintenance using the analytic hierarchy process and heuristics

Abstract: The management of low-volume roads has transitioned from focusing on maintenance designed to protect a capital investment in road infrastructure to also include environmental effects. In this study, two models using mathematical programming are applied to schedule forest road maintenance and upgrade activities involving non-monetary benefits. Model I uses a linear objective function formulation that maximizes benefit subject to budgetary constraints. Model II uses a non-linear objective function to maxi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then the geometric mean was used to incorporate the ratings of decision makers (Aczel, Saaty 1983). After the pair-wise comparison matrices were completed, the inconsistency and weights were derived using the eigenvector method (Saaty 2000;Coulter et al 2003). Then the factors were combined in the form of a weighted linear combination:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then the geometric mean was used to incorporate the ratings of decision makers (Aczel, Saaty 1983). After the pair-wise comparison matrices were completed, the inconsistency and weights were derived using the eigenvector method (Saaty 2000;Coulter et al 2003). Then the factors were combined in the form of a weighted linear combination:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In road planning different kinds of criteria often exist, particularly with environmental factors. Coulter et al (2003) stated that AHP provides a useful framework to provide quantitative measures of environmental benefits of forest road maintenance. Also Coulter et al (2006) stated that AHP has the potential to provide a consistent approach to the ranking of forest road investments based on multiple criteria.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance prioritization (Farhan & Fwa, 2009;Moazami et al, 2011;Taghipour et al, 2011) (Ouma et al, 2015) (Wakchaure & Jha, 2011) (Liu et al, 2012;Cafiso et al, 2002;Hankach et al, 2011;Trojan & Morais, 2012b) (Monte & de Almeida-Filho, 2016;de et al, 2015b) Resource Planning (Azadeh et al, 2013) Almeida et al, 2013) (Garmabaki et al, 2016;de Almeida., 2001;Liu & Frangopol, 2006) Maintenance Scheduling (Coulter et al, 2006;Eslami et al, 2014) ( Van et al, 2013) (Certa et al, 2013) (Almeida, A. T., 2012) Operational Level…”
Section: Expert Maintenance Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rodriguez-Perez et al (2007) pointed out that the use of GPS in the forest ecosystem introduces problems related to signal reception under the forest canopy, including the visibility of satellites in a given territory at the time of measurement. Coulter et al (2006) were convinced that the best method to set the maintenance plan of a forest road network is a combination of heuristic analysis, analysis of financial costs and impacts on the environment, and "expert judgment". They are one of the few authors who add a certain degree of the experience of the staff responsible for the forest road network condition to the otherwise mostly exact method of decision-making.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%