2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.pt.2007.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schistosomiasis in African infants and preschool children: to treat or not to treat?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
105
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 However, pre-school-aged children might be particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of an early-life infection with Schistosoma, because they would not get treatment until entering school. 27 Additionally, adolescents and adults are given far less attention than the school-aged population when it comes to schistosomiasis control. Indeed, World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution 54.19 sets clear treatment coverage targets for the school-aged population, but it remains comparatively silent on other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25,26 However, pre-school-aged children might be particularly vulnerable to the negative consequences of an early-life infection with Schistosoma, because they would not get treatment until entering school. 27 Additionally, adolescents and adults are given far less attention than the school-aged population when it comes to schistosomiasis control. Indeed, World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution 54.19 sets clear treatment coverage targets for the school-aged population, but it remains comparatively silent on other age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[12][13][14]28,29 It has also been discussed whether preventive chemotherapy should be extended from schoolaged to pre-school-aged children. 27,[30][31][32] However, there are a number of issues that must be addressed before policy recommendations can be made regarding the inclusion of preschoolers in preventive chemotherapy. First, what is the true extent of Schistosoma infection in pre-school-aged children in different epidemiologic settings?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New data suggest that the Kato-Katz technique has drawbacks for screening stool samples from infants, as helminth infection intensities tend to be low and stool samples are more liquid than those collected from school-aged children or adults (Goodman et al, 2007). This issue is of considerable relevance, as recent studies suggest that infants and pre-school children are at higher risk of helminth infections and associated morbidity than previously assumed (Goodman et al, 2007;Stothard and Gabrielli, 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And although PSAC are currently not targeted by schistosomiasis control activities, it may be worthwhile for programs to consider including them in preventive chemotherapy campaigns, especially where the prevalence is high among SAC. 9,13 The use of praziquantel among young children has been hindered by a lack of safety data among children < 4 years of age, 9,23 and no widely available liquid formulation; however, recent studies in which young children have been treated with praziquantel have reported no major adverse effects. 10,11,13 We found that the sensitivity of stool exams for S. mansoni was limited, especially among PSAC; the observed difference in its performance across age groups is likely a function of infection intensity.…”
Section: 13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most mass treatment programs have not been designed to include them and younger children are often not even screened for the possibility of infection. 9 However, in areas endemic for schistosomiasis, very young children are also in regular contact with water in locations where infected snails are present and infants are bathed in water where transmission is occurring. [10][11][12][13] Infections in young children may be missed because they are not usually examined or the testing method most commonly used for epidemiologic research (examination of a single stool specimen by Kato-Katz thick smears) may not be sufficiently sensitive, particularly in detecting light infections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%