2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Connectedness Is an Underemphasized Parameter in Adolescent Mental Health: Results of a Community Prediction Study

Abstract: There is limited prospective research on the relation between school connectedness (i.e., the extent to which students feel accepted, valued, respected, and included in the school) and mental health symptoms in adolescents. A sample of 2,022 students (999 boys and 1,023 girls) ages 12 to 14 years were measured at 2 time points (12 months apart) on school connectedness and mental health symptoms (general functioning, depression, and anxiety symptoms). School connectedness correlated extensively with concurrent … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

35
451
10
13

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 534 publications
(526 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
35
451
10
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Libbey, Ireland and Resnick (2002) found in their cross-sectional study negative associations between connectedness and emotional distress, with family connectedness showing the strongest negative relationship, followed by school, neighbourhood, and peer connectedness. In a similar study, Shochet et al (2006) examined the relationship between school connectedness and mental health difficulties in adolescents across time points: they found that school connectedness negatively correlated with concurrent mental health symptoms, and more importantly, it predicted changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and general functioning one year later. Hall-Lande et al (2007) reported that family connectedness was a very strong protective factor against suicide attempts, particularlyin adolescents who were socially isolated.…”
Section: Social Connectedness As a Protective Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libbey, Ireland and Resnick (2002) found in their cross-sectional study negative associations between connectedness and emotional distress, with family connectedness showing the strongest negative relationship, followed by school, neighbourhood, and peer connectedness. In a similar study, Shochet et al (2006) examined the relationship between school connectedness and mental health difficulties in adolescents across time points: they found that school connectedness negatively correlated with concurrent mental health symptoms, and more importantly, it predicted changes in depressive symptoms, anxiety, and general functioning one year later. Hall-Lande et al (2007) reported that family connectedness was a very strong protective factor against suicide attempts, particularlyin adolescents who were socially isolated.…”
Section: Social Connectedness As a Protective Factormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factors that appear to have protective effects against depression include higher self esteem (Allgood-Merten & Lewinsohn, 1990;Kandel & Davies, 1982;Lewinsohn, Roberts et al, 1994) and greater school connectedness (Shocet, Dadds, Ham, & Montague, 2006). Social support from parents and peers also buffers adolescents from depression (Galambos et al, 2004;Lewinsohn, Roberts et al, 1994;Windle, 1992), although some studies have reported this association for females but not males (e.g., Gutman & Sameroff, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,12,13 Consistent with this idea, positive aspects of school socioeducational environments, such as good student-student and student-teacher relationships, teacher support, student connectedness, and classroom management practices, have been reported to reduce the risk of depressive symptomatology in students. [14][15][16][17] However, evidence regarding the association between school socioeducational environment and student depressive symptomatology is limited in several ways. 17 Most importantly, the large majority of studies have only examined the way students perceive their school environments in single-level designs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%