2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ffa.2007.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schubert unions in Grassmann varieties

Abstract: We study subsets of Grassmann varieties G(l, m) over a field F , such that these subsets are unions of Schubert cycles, with respect to a fixed flag. We study the linear spans of, and in case of positive characteristic, the number of Fq-rational points on such unions. Moreover we study a geometric duality of such unions, and give a combinatorial interpretation of this duality. We discuss the maximum number of Fq-rational points for Schubert unions of a given spanning dimension, and we give some applications to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
7
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To this end, we provide, toward the end of this paper, an initial tangible goal by stating conjectural formulae for d r (C(2, m)) when μ + 1 r 2μ − 3, and also when k − 2μ + 3 r k − μ − 1. It may be noted that these conjectural formulae, and of course both (5) and (6), corroborate a conjecture of Hansen, Johnsen and Ranestad [7,8] that in most cases, the differences of consecutive higher weights of Grassmann codes is a power of q.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…To this end, we provide, toward the end of this paper, an initial tangible goal by stating conjectural formulae for d r (C(2, m)) when μ + 1 r 2μ − 3, and also when k − 2μ + 3 r k − μ − 1. It may be noted that these conjectural formulae, and of course both (5) and (6), corroborate a conjecture of Hansen, Johnsen and Ranestad [7,8] that in most cases, the differences of consecutive higher weights of Grassmann codes is a power of q.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In general, we believe that, as predicted in most cases by Hansen, Johnsen and Ranestad [7,8], the difference d r (C( , m)) − d r−1 (C( , m)) is always a power of q, and that determining d r (C( , m)) from d r−1 (C( , m)) is a matter of deciphering the correct term of the Gaussian binomial coefficient (which can be written as a finite sum of powers of q) that gets added to d r−1 (C( , m)). …”
Section: Lemma 24 Let E and E 1 Be Subspaces Ofsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Schubert codes, a generalization of the Grassmann codes, were introduced by Ghorpade and Lachaud in 1998 as codes associated to projective systems defined by Schubert varieties, and they give an upper bound for its minimum distance with a conjecture for its actual value [4,5]. See also [7][8][9][10][11]17] for recent developments, where we would like to call the attention to the problem of the determination of the complete weight hierarchy of linear codes associated to these varieties, and for the study of unions of Schubert cycles in Grassmann varieties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%