2009
DOI: 10.4038/sllim.v2i2.442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientometric Dimensions of Knowledge Management Research in India: A Study based on Scopus database

Abstract: This paper attempts to analyse quantitatively the growth and development of Knowledge Management Research in India in terms of publication output as reflected in Scopus database. During 1999-2007 a total of 51 papers were published by the Knowledge Management researchers to various domains: Business, Management and Accounting (24), Engineering (18), Social Sciences (7), Computer Science (6), Decision Sciences (6), Multidisciplinary (4), Mathematics (3), Environmental Science (2) (2), others journals each (1). … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indian knowledge management researchers during 1999–2007 as reflected in Scopus database have produced 51 publications that is 5.67 average publications per year (Surulinathi et al , 2009) as against 1,043 world-wide total KM papers published during 1974–2008 with an average publication of 30.67 per year (Dwivedi et al , 2011). This suggests that Indian KM researchers’ contribution toward the world KM research output is relatively low.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indian knowledge management researchers during 1999–2007 as reflected in Scopus database have produced 51 publications that is 5.67 average publications per year (Surulinathi et al , 2009) as against 1,043 world-wide total KM papers published during 1974–2008 with an average publication of 30.67 per year (Dwivedi et al , 2011). This suggests that Indian KM researchers’ contribution toward the world KM research output is relatively low.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The information can now be collected, analysed and distributed in ways that were not previously possible.Thisnewapproachhashelpedscientificjournalsinreachingagreateraudience.Either insidethescientificcommunityontheirownwebsitesand/orthroughindexeddatabases (Abadal and Alcaraz, 2006). And databases help to collect, store, filter and make sense of scattered information (Surulinathi, Amsaveni, Maheswaran, & Srinivasaraghavan, 2013). Against this background,academicdatabaseshaveproliferated,offeringsearchservicesonatopic,andeven runningcitationsanalysis.ThebetterknownareWebofScience(WoS),ScopusorGoogleScholar, moregeneralist.Others,suchPubMedformedicinearemorespecificdependingonthesubject field (Falagas,Pitsouni,Malietzis,&Pappas,2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%