2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10461-020-02998-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Screening for HIV-Associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND) in Adults Aged 50 and Over Attending a Government HIV Clinic in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Comparison of the International HIV Dementia Scale (IHDS) and IDEA Six Item Dementia Screen

Abstract: Validated screening tools for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) are lacking for the newly emergent ageing population of people living with HIV (PLWH) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). We aimed to validate and compare diagnostic accuracy of two cognitive screening tools, the International HIV dementia scale (IHDS), and the Identification and Interventions for Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) screen, for identification of HAND in older PLWH in Tanzania. A systematic sample of 253 PLWH aged ≥ 50 attend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HAND was diagnosed by consensus using AAN 2007 gold standard criteria 5 based on neuropsychological battery measures validated for cross-cultural use by the WHO, clinical/neurological examination findings, to determine if other psychiatric disorders better explained cognitive performance, and a collateral history from a close relative or friend. All participants underwent additional detailed locally-validated low-literacy neuropsychological tests of cortical function, the details of which have previously been published 6 . Domains assessed included working memory, verbal memory (learning, delayed recall and recognition memory), fine motor control, motor speed, visuoconstruction, executive function and comprehension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…HAND was diagnosed by consensus using AAN 2007 gold standard criteria 5 based on neuropsychological battery measures validated for cross-cultural use by the WHO, clinical/neurological examination findings, to determine if other psychiatric disorders better explained cognitive performance, and a collateral history from a close relative or friend. All participants underwent additional detailed locally-validated low-literacy neuropsychological tests of cortical function, the details of which have previously been published 6 . Domains assessed included working memory, verbal memory (learning, delayed recall and recognition memory), fine motor control, motor speed, visuoconstruction, executive function and comprehension.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practice trials and errors were managed according to a standardized protocol and tests selected were validated locally and/or in low literacy SSA settings. Neuropsychological test results were compared to performance means for those with and without 4 years of formal education generated in 2016 from a comparison group of similar age and education level attending the ophthalmology outpatient department of MRRH 6 , 21 . The collateral history and all clinical and neuropsychological information was used for a multi-disciplinary discussion of each participant by the research team to confirm diagnoses and record a detailed case summary.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The primary purpose of the baseline study was identification and screening of HIVassociated neurocognitive disorders (HAND) and a detailed description of recruitment and baseline assessment has previously been published (16). In brief, a systematic sample (every third eligible individual) was recruited March-May 2016.…”
Section: Recruitment Sampling and Background Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Detailed HIV-disease severity, e.g. CD4 count or viral load, and comorbidity data were obtained from standardised clinic records as previously reported (16). Other demographic data were self-reported and corroborated by informants where necessary.…”
Section: Recruitment Sampling and Background Datamentioning
confidence: 99%