1985
DOI: 10.1109/tei.1985.348896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary Electron Emission Yields of Carbon Coated Copper and Niobium Real Surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, we can either conclude that the sample that Bronshtein and Fraiman (1969) used was also oxidized, or that oxidation has little effect on d for Nb. Septier and Belgarovi (1985) have also measured d for Nb and their results are generally higher than ours or those of Bronshtein and Fraiman (1969). The calculations of Ding et al (2001) using Equation (4) are much higher than the experimental values from the cleaned specimen.…”
Section: Niobiumcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Hence, we can either conclude that the sample that Bronshtein and Fraiman (1969) used was also oxidized, or that oxidation has little effect on d for Nb. Septier and Belgarovi (1985) have also measured d for Nb and their results are generally higher than ours or those of Bronshtein and Fraiman (1969). The calculations of Ding et al (2001) using Equation (4) are much higher than the experimental values from the cleaned specimen.…”
Section: Niobiumcontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…Case of D1 sample (no solder mask included) Fig. 8 shows the experimental yield of secondary electrons (SE) for copper in terms of the primary electron energy from various literature sources [16][17][18]. In our case, the primary electron energy is 1.5 keV, hence it can be seen that the SE yield (d) for Cu is around 0.7.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…25. Black lines correspond to various experimental measurements (13,(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) different characters of ELF. The influence of the different approaches to the q-space extrapolation (SPA vs. DFT), also has a different effect on the inelastic mean free path (IMFP) for the two materials.…”
Section: A Simulation Of Sey Of Copper and Aluminiummentioning
confidence: 99%