1978
DOI: 10.1016/0026-0495(78)90125-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Secondary type II hyperlipoproteinemia in patients with anorexia nervosa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
22
1

Year Published

1981
1981
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
22
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher LDL-TG:LDL-ApoB ratio of our present AN patients could be explained by decreased TG hydrolysis because of decreased activities of hepatic TG lipase and/or lipoprotein lipase, probably because of loss of metabolically active peripheral tissues. In accordance with this hypothesis, Mordasini et al (1978) found in a selected group of four patients with AN significantly decreased activities of both enzymes. Furthermore, we showed that AN patients had a significantly lower BMR than CO. Lipoprotein composition influences their susceptibility to oxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The higher LDL-TG:LDL-ApoB ratio of our present AN patients could be explained by decreased TG hydrolysis because of decreased activities of hepatic TG lipase and/or lipoprotein lipase, probably because of loss of metabolically active peripheral tissues. In accordance with this hypothesis, Mordasini et al (1978) found in a selected group of four patients with AN significantly decreased activities of both enzymes. Furthermore, we showed that AN patients had a significantly lower BMR than CO. Lipoprotein composition influences their susceptibility to oxidation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The higher concentrations were based on higher LDL-Chol levels, as also described in previous studies (Mordasini et al 1978), but not confirmed by others (Arden et al 1990;Mehler et al 1998). The mean difference between CO and AN in our present study was rather small, in contrast to markedly elevated Chol levels found in reasonably large cohorts in early reports in the literature (Klinefelter, 1965; Crisp et al 1968;Mehler et al 1998;Mordasini et al 1978). A high degree of selection of patients of certain subgroups in these studies could be the reason.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations