2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2018.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Securing the continuity of medical competence in times of demographic change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example question concerning support from colleagues reads as follows: "For my work I get sufficient appreciation and support from my colleagues" (positive pole=1) or "My work is not appreciated and unnecessarily criticized by my colleagues" (negative pole=10). The scale is highly reliable with Cronbach's Alpha = 0.91 in this and 0.78 in prior studies [56].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An example question concerning support from colleagues reads as follows: "For my work I get sufficient appreciation and support from my colleagues" (positive pole=1) or "My work is not appreciated and unnecessarily criticized by my colleagues" (negative pole=10). The scale is highly reliable with Cronbach's Alpha = 0.91 in this and 0.78 in prior studies [56].…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…It is important that job requirements and work resources are balanced [53]. Based on extensive preliminary studies published elsewhere [54][55][56], we combined these aspects in a polarity profile, which includes questions to be scored from 1 (positive pole) to 10 (negative pole; see table 2). An example question concerning support from colleagues reads as follows: "For my work I get sufficient appreciation and support from my colleagues" (positive pole=1) or "My work is not appreciated and unnecessarily criticized by my colleagues" (negative pole=10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Hasebrook et al, 2022) Here, the scale was found to be highly reliable with an Cronbach's Alpha of 0.91 while in prior studies in the same present setting, the reliability was examined to lay at 0.78. (Hahnenkamp et al, 2018) In this study, mean ratings show a positive attitude and vary between 1.5 and 3.4 (with 1 o 5 indicating a more positive and 6 to 10 a more negative evaluation) with "purposeful work" being the best and "demanding working hours" the worst evaluation (see table 9). It is noteworthy that all significant intercorrelations between the items of the Physi-cianPlus satisfaction Scale were positive suggesting that all items are positively connected to a general concept of job satisfaction (see table 10).…”
Section: Physicianplus Satisfaction Scalementioning
confidence: 55%
“…The 14 items PhysicianPlus job satisfaction scale had a satisfactory reliability of Cronbach's alpha = 0.78. In other preliminary studies the PhysicianPlus scale which is based on the well-known employees promotor scale was already used in the same setting (Hasebrook et al, 2016b;Hinkelmann et al, 2017;Hahnenkamp et al, 2018) but also in different settings such as the project "rural/rescue". (Hasebrook et al, 2022) Here, the scale was found to be highly reliable with an Cronbach's Alpha of 0.91 while in prior studies in the same present setting, the reliability was examined to lay at 0.78.…”
Section: Physicianplus Satisfaction Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The questionnaire consisted of 36 items (Appendix A) and was based on similar questionnaires used in prior studies. These prior versions came with Cronbach's Alpha levels between 0.78 [78] and 0.91 [79]. The survey used in this study also shows a sufficient reliability (Cronbach's Alpha = 0.83).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 91%