2017
DOI: 10.1002/lno.10485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sediment resuspension mechanisms and their contributions to high‐turbidity events in a large lake

Abstract: High-resolution field data, collected during April to October of 2008-2009, were analyzed to investigate the quantitative contribution of sediment resuspension to high-turbidity events in central Lake Erie. Resuspension events were distinguished within high-turbidity events according to turbidity, fluorescence and acoustic backscatter timeseries, as well as satellite images. We observed 16 high-turbidity events, causing a total duration of 20 d (out of 344 d) with elevated nearbed turbidity (> 10 NTU). Of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
103
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Large storms are known to cause benthic storms at great depths (e.g., Gardner et al, 2017). Valipour et al (2017) correlated maxima in ADCP signal amplitude to individual resuspension events in Lake Erie, similar to the event recorded at OC26 during the passage of Hurricane Isaac. Current meter data presented by Spencer et al (2016) indicate propagation of near-inertial energy from Hurricane Isaac into the water column at M1, M3, and M4 affecting currents near the seafloor at >1,250 m water depth (Figure 7) and producing bed shear stress of 0.06 to 0.1 Pa and peak velocities of 23 cm s -1 at the current meter (Figures 14-17).…”
Section: Episodic Large-scale Resuspension Eventsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large storms are known to cause benthic storms at great depths (e.g., Gardner et al, 2017). Valipour et al (2017) correlated maxima in ADCP signal amplitude to individual resuspension events in Lake Erie, similar to the event recorded at OC26 during the passage of Hurricane Isaac. Current meter data presented by Spencer et al (2016) indicate propagation of near-inertial energy from Hurricane Isaac into the water column at M1, M3, and M4 affecting currents near the seafloor at >1,250 m water depth (Figure 7) and producing bed shear stress of 0.06 to 0.1 Pa and peak velocities of 23 cm s -1 at the current meter (Figures 14-17).…”
Section: Episodic Large-scale Resuspension Eventsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Light green bars mark the collection intervals that sampled small-scale resuspension events in the near field; dark green bars mark the collecting periods that correspond to the far-field small resuspension events of 23 profiles spanning 5 years we observed a BNL 21 times ( Table 1). Sediment resuspension events occur from all depths of the seafloor and in a variety of environments, including large lacustrine environments (Valipour et al, 2017), and coastal and deep open ocean areas (Gardner, 1978;Gardner et al, 1984Gardner et al, , 1985Gardner et al, , 2017Walsh et al, 1988;Bonnin et al, 2002Bonnin et al, , 2005Bonnin et al, , 2006Bonnin, 2004;Puig et al, 2004Puig et al, , 2012Puig et al, , 2013Peine et al, 2009;Ross et al, 2009). Benthic nepheloid layers formed by erosion and resuspension of material from the seafloor are thus also found at all depths in the world ocean.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The floating algal bloom area was masked by FAI index [ Hu , ; Hu et al , ] due to the algal bloom preventing light from penetrating the water, such as in the northwest and southwest parts of the lake. High K d (490) values in summer (6 and 15 July 2007 in Figure ) were mainly caused by algal growth [ Valipour et al , ]. Low K d (490) values were distributed beyond the algal bloom area, such as in the center of the lake.…”
Section: Results and Discussion Of Model Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Fukuda and Lick (); (2) Lee et al (); (3) Lick et al (); (4) Lou et al (); (5) Cardenas et al (); (6) Hawley and Eadie (); (7) Harris et al (); (8) Hawley et al (); (9) Morales‐Marin et al (); and (10) Valipour et al ().…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%