2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-41860-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Segmenting Mechanomyography Measures of Muscle Activity Phases Using Inertial Data

Abstract: Electromyography (EMG) is the standard technology for monitoring muscle activity in laboratory environments, either using surface electrodes or fine wire electrodes inserted into the muscle. Due to limitations such as cost, complexity, and technical factors, including skin impedance with surface EMG and the invasive nature of fine wire electrodes, EMG is impractical for use outside of a laboratory environment. Mechanomyography (MMG) is an alternative to EMG, which shows promise in pervasive applications. The p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With respect to waveform analysis, previous studies have used both EMG and MMG to evaluate muscle contraction 26 , 32 , 33 . In these methods, the MMGRMS and MMGMPF are generally used for analysis, and we also used a similar method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With respect to waveform analysis, previous studies have used both EMG and MMG to evaluate muscle contraction 26 , 32 , 33 . In these methods, the MMGRMS and MMGMPF are generally used for analysis, and we also used a similar method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 (MMG). The raw MMG data were band-pass filtered between 2 and 100 Hz, whereas the raw EMG data were band-pass filtered between 10 and 500 Hz using a fourth-order Butterworth filter as was performed in previous studies 33 , 39 . Added on this previous study, as the area under 2 Hz included much noise, lower threshold of 2 Hz for filtering was selected (Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose three predictors of interest based on emerging wearable technologies and their ability to classify stress states, sleep status, and extent of physical exertion. For example, tooth-borne biosensors can monitor saliva in the oral cavity to measure alpha amylase and estimate stress states ( Robles et al, 2011 ; Tseng et al, 2018 ), wrist-worn accelerometers can monitor actigraphy and estimate sleep/wake cycles, including sleep loss and deprivation ( Dunican et al, 2018 ), and arm- or leg-worn mechanomyography and electromyography sensors can be used to characterize the intensity and duration of physical exertion ( Esposito et al, 1998 ; Woodward et al, 2019 ). Given the increasing availability of these sensors, these three specific predictors are likely to be used in real-world situations.…”
Section: Predictors Of Interest: Stress Sleep and Physical Exertionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, Cudlip, et al [8] suggest the utilization of EMG, either via surface or fine wire, for testing to assess function and activity of the SM [8]. However, surface electrodes were determined to have some contamination in signal from surrounding structures, and fine wire electrodes are found to pick up electrical signal from only portions of the muscle [9]. Therefore, these commonly utilized methods of testing muscle activity are self-limiting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%