2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.07.103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic centrifuge modelling of suction bucket foundation for offshore wind turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A numerical analysis [6] indicates that the response specific method underestimates the maximum tower-base moment by over 70% compared to the results of time-domain simulation for a parked wind turbine. Some experimental studies [7][8][9][10] also indicate that earthquakes enhance the lateral tower-top displacement significantly to a level that makes it almost impossible to observe meaningful results when using RSM. In comparison, timevarying seismic assessments using the finite element method (FEM) is considered as an alternative method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical analysis [6] indicates that the response specific method underestimates the maximum tower-base moment by over 70% compared to the results of time-domain simulation for a parked wind turbine. Some experimental studies [7][8][9][10] also indicate that earthquakes enhance the lateral tower-top displacement significantly to a level that makes it almost impossible to observe meaningful results when using RSM. In comparison, timevarying seismic assessments using the finite element method (FEM) is considered as an alternative method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [89] conducted seismic centrifuge modelling to study the behaviour of suction bucket foundations for offshore wind turbines. Nine centrifuge tests were carried out for suction bucket foundations in both dry sand and saturated sandy soil to evaluate the effect of bucket geometry on seismic response by analysing recorded accelerations, pore water pressure ratios, and settlements of both the suction bucket foundation and soil surface.…”
Section: Capacity Of Bucket Foundations Under Cyclic Loading and Eartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Offshore wind energy has become an increasingly attractive solution for energy conversion due to the enormous energy potential associated with the vast offshore areas, higher wind speeds, more consistent wind patterns, decreased noise and visual effects for human population centers [1,2]. Most of offshore wind turbines are installed in shallow water (<50 m) on the bottom-fixed foundations, such as monopiles, gravity-based, jackets and bucket foundations [3][4][5]. With the development of offshore wind energy, it is inevitable for a wind farm to move towards the deeper water to harvest stronger and superior wind resource [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%