2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-9906-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic hazard assessment in continental Ecuador

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
9
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[9]. The results of the seismic hazard investigations by [10] are similar to those presented by the Ecuadorian Standard in terms of rock acceleration; however, they differ in the southern part of the country [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[9]. The results of the seismic hazard investigations by [10] are similar to those presented by the Ecuadorian Standard in terms of rock acceleration; however, they differ in the southern part of the country [10].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This zone experiences the highest seismic activity, given the large number of active faults present; however, when compared to Zones 1 and 4, the lengths of its faults are less long. Table 12 summarizes the results of a comparison of expected magnitudes derived from the probabilistic model (return period 475 y) with maximum magnitudes estimated in the subduction models as proposed by [10] and [18]. The authors' most representative zoning was compared with that of the K-Means clustering method for the lower and upper limits of the 95% confidence interval.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the geometry of the subduction of the oceanic plate by depth contours has been consistented with the tectonic and seismic characteristics of the region, proposing a subduction start of a low slope, which would be the cause of accumulation of tension and seismicity generation until a depth of 40 to 50 km [10][11][12], to later increase its slope to beyond the East of the Andes (Figure 2). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, an earthquake and tsunami of such magnitude was not expected. Considering the significance of the event, a multidisciplinary EEFIT team of 9 was sent to conduct an initial field mission (27th May to 4th June 2011) with a focus on assessing damage to buildings and coastal infrastructure [ (Parra et al, 2016). Much of the observed damage due to this event extends south along the coast from the hypocentre in the Manabi region.…”
Section: The 2011 Tōhoku Earthquakementioning
confidence: 99%