“…The resolved MTs are typically decomposed into volumetric and deviatoric components, using various decomposition schemes allowing for an understanding of the detailed physical kinematic source processes, regardless of the type of seismicity and event magnitude. The MT inversion has been applied to resolve the displacements in the source for large and small natural earthquakes (Vavryčuk et al, 2008;Scognamiglio et al, 2010;, induced microseismicity (Ross et al, 1996;Panza and Saraò, 2000;Šílený and Milev, 2006;Cesca et al, 2013;Guilhem et al, 2014;Johnson, 2014a,b), as well as for acoustic emission activity measured in situ (Manthei et al, 2001;Collins et al, 2002) or in laboratory experiments on rocks samples (Sellers et al, 2003;Thompson et al, 2009;Graham et al, 2010;Charalampidou et al, 2011;Kwiatek, Goebel, and Dresen, 2014). The analysis of seismic MTs sheds light on numerous issues of earthquake physics, such as rupture dynamics (McGarr and Fletcher, 2003;McGarr et al, 2010), fault complexity (McLaskey and Glaser, 2011;McGarr, 2012), the role of pore pressure in seismogenic processes (Fischer and Guest, 2011), and damage-related radiation of seismic energy (Ben-Zion and Ampuero, 2009;Castro and Ben-Zion, 2013, among others).…”