2021
DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1916852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Seismic Response of Masonry Buildings in Historical Centres Struck by the 2016 Central Italy Earthquake. Impact of Building Features on Damage Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All masonry types appeared to have low mechanical performances, as, in M1 and M2, bond stones are missing and two leaves were evident from surveys; in M3, the percentage of voids is high, and blocks are laid with holes parallel to bed joints. However, this is a common feature of pre-standard block masonry walls [8,39].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…All masonry types appeared to have low mechanical performances, as, in M1 and M2, bond stones are missing and two leaves were evident from surveys; in M3, the percentage of voids is high, and blocks are laid with holes parallel to bed joints. However, this is a common feature of pre-standard block masonry walls [8,39].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Single houses account for 72% of the whole built stock [1], among which terraced buildings are widespread, particularly in historical settlements located in hilly or mountainous contexts [8].…”
Section: Introduction 1seismic Risk Of Residential Buildingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both in-depth analyses and large-scale vulnerability assessment campaigns are often carried out on 'ancient', i.e., built earlier than 1919, individual buildings or building stocks [8][9][10]. The tools for seismic assessment depend on whether a building's seismic behaviour is governed by either out-of-plane local mechanisms or overall shear behaviour of masonry walls [11][12][13].…”
Section: Existing Masonry Buildings: Structural and Energy Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic preservation of the construction heritage is a crucial task for the human life protection and for social-economic-historical roles represented by historical noble and public Palaces (Valluzzi et al 2021), churches (Valente and Milani, 2018a;Valente and Milani, 2018b;Valente and Milani, 2018c), basilicas (Zucca et al, 2018;Zucca et al, 2020;Fazzi et al, 2021) and towers (Pavia et al, 2017;Kita et al, 2021). These buildings, built in areas only nowadays classified as seismic (Dal Cin and Russo 2016; Valente and Milani 2018a), must be preserved from the future earthquake's effects to avoid possible failures and collapses like the ones occurred for instance in Italy during the last century: Sicily (1908), Irpinia and Volture (1930), Belice (1968), Friuli (1976), Irpinia (1980), Carlentini (1990), Umbria and Marche (1997), Molise (2002), Abruzzo (2009), Emilia-Romagna (2012), Marche and Abruzzo (2016), and Ischia (2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%