2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2004.12.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting and weighting features using a genetic algorithm in a case-based reasoning approach to personnel rostering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past decades several researchers have studied CBR methods in real world applications, such as medical diagnosis [19], [20], product recommendation [21] and personal rostering decisions [22]. CBR is a cyclic and integrated process of solving a problem and learning from the experience of experts, which is used to build a knowledge domain which is then recorded to be used to help solve future problems.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Cbr and Other Types Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past decades several researchers have studied CBR methods in real world applications, such as medical diagnosis [19], [20], product recommendation [21] and personal rostering decisions [22]. CBR is a cyclic and integrated process of solving a problem and learning from the experience of experts, which is used to build a knowledge domain which is then recorded to be used to help solve future problems.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Cbr and Other Types Of Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, to integrate feature weighting (FW) and feature selection (FS) into KNN. In this framework, FW is used to estimate the optimal weights of the original features of cases [27], [28] , and FS is employed when choosing relevant features of cases [20], [22], or their aggregation is used to leverage their usefulness [19]. Second, to merge data clustering with KNN, where the structure of clustered cases is leveraged to lead to more relevant cases [29], [30].…”
Section: Data Mining and Cbrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other new approaches and methodologies for timetabling problems have also been studied as more problem solving experience is collected and new technologies provide new breakthroughs. These include Case-Based Reasoning (Leake, 1996) on educational timetabling (Burke, MacCarthy et al 2000, 2003&2005, Burke, Petrovic and Qu, 2006 and on nurse rostering (Beddoe and Petrovic, 2005), fuzzy methodology on exam timetabling (Asmuni, Burke and Garibaldi, 2004), and hyper-heuristics on timetabling (Burke, Kendall and Soubeiga, 2003, Gaw, Rattadilok and Kwan, 2004, Burke, Dror et al, 2005, Burke, Petrovic and Qu, 2006.…”
Section: Approaches and Techniques In Timetabling Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Column generation was employed in nurse scheduling (Bard and Purnomo, 2005) using set covering-type models and integer programming. Knowledge based techniques have also been explored for solving nurse rostering problems (Beddoe andPetrovic, 2005, Lukman et al, 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%