2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-53656-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Clinically Relevant Gait Characteristics for Classification of Early Parkinson’s Disease: A Comprehensive Machine Learning Approach

Abstract: Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease; gait impairments are typical and are associated with increased fall risk and poor quality of life. Gait is potentially a useful biomarker to help discriminate PD at an early stage, however the optimal characteristics and combination are unclear. In this study, we used machine learning (ML) techniques to determine the optimal combination of gait characteristics to discriminate people with PD and healthy controls (HC). 303 participants… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
80
3
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
9
80
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…We propose the additional information achieved through a comprehensive analysis of each component of the signal can better quantify these complex characteristics and is the reason for an improved classification accuracy. Previously when examining people with PD with the use of instrumented walkways, step width and its variability showed low correlation with other gait characteristics but was highly relevant for classification [33], [34]. To our knowledge, single accelerometers located on the lower back, cannot accurately quantify step width and the benefit of assessing it with the already included characteristics is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We propose the additional information achieved through a comprehensive analysis of each component of the signal can better quantify these complex characteristics and is the reason for an improved classification accuracy. Previously when examining people with PD with the use of instrumented walkways, step width and its variability showed low correlation with other gait characteristics but was highly relevant for classification [33], [34]. To our knowledge, single accelerometers located on the lower back, cannot accurately quantify step width and the benefit of assessing it with the already included characteristics is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Of the gait and turning characteristics included in the random forest classifier, angular velocity was the most important in the classification of PD. We have previously used gait characteristics in the classification of PD [ 48 , 49 ], resulting in 73–93% accuracy. In addition, PLS-DA trained on the gait characteristics gave a classification accuracy of 70.42–88.73% (AUC: 78.4–94.5%) with a sensitivity of 72.84–90.12% and specificity of 60.3–86.89% [ 30 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The support vector machine with radial basis function (SVM-RBF) and random forest were used because these are the most widely used ML models for PD classification [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]40]. The models were trained on the same conceptual features from both sensing systems to compare the impact of walking protocols and gait assessment systems.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Gait Normalization and Classificationmentioning
confidence: 99%