2003
DOI: 10.1016/s1571-0653(04)00462-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting Complementary Pairs of Literals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1, we illustrate this gap for some small values of k. For k = 3, the upper bound on r * k comes from [14], while for k > 3 from [13,20]. The best algorithmic lower bound for k = 3 is from [16,19], while for k > 3 it is from [15]. Similar results (and gaps) exist for a number of other constraint satisfaction problems, such as random NAE k-SAT and hypergraph 2-coloring, regular random graph coloring, random Max k-SAT, and others (see [2,4,5,6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Table 1, we illustrate this gap for some small values of k. For k = 3, the upper bound on r * k comes from [14], while for k > 3 from [13,20]. The best algorithmic lower bound for k = 3 is from [16,19], while for k > 3 it is from [15]. Similar results (and gaps) exist for a number of other constraint satisfaction problems, such as random NAE k-SAT and hypergraph 2-coloring, regular random graph coloring, random Max k-SAT, and others (see [2,4,5,6]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge the best result found by myopic algorithms is due to Achlioptas [1], but the greedy algorithm of Kaporis et al [5] pushes this bound a bit further. We emphasize that this contribution does not claim to come up with an even sharper proven lower bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The existence of this phase transition at a critical density α c was proven by Friedgut in 1999 [Fri99]; 2 however only in the k = 2 case its value is known exactly (α c = 1 [CR92, Goe92, BBC + 01]). A long line of works for k = 3 have narrowed it down to 3.52 ≤ α c ≤ 4.49 [KKL03,HS03,DKMP08] (with evidence that α c ≈ 4.267 [MPZ02]), and in the large k limit it has been shown that 2 k ln 2…”
Section: Random Qsatmentioning
confidence: 99%