2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.02.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selecting the preferable bancassurance alliance strategic by using expert group decision technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, integrated approaches have been extensively applied in the literature. Some examples of these applications include selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistic value chain (Büyüközkan et al, 2008), evaluation of Turkish cement firms' performance (Ertuğrul & Karakaşoğlu, 2009), evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms (Gumus, 2009 (Tzeng et al, 2005), and selection of the most suitable bancassurance alliance structure (Wu et al, 2009). However, during the literature survey, we have not encountered an integrated decision-making method to guide managers in taking a proper decision about six sigma project selection.…”
Section: Evaluation Framework and Methods For Six Sigma Project Selecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, integrated approaches have been extensively applied in the literature. Some examples of these applications include selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistic value chain (Büyüközkan et al, 2008), evaluation of Turkish cement firms' performance (Ertuğrul & Karakaşoğlu, 2009), evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms (Gumus, 2009 (Tzeng et al, 2005), and selection of the most suitable bancassurance alliance structure (Wu et al, 2009). However, during the literature survey, we have not encountered an integrated decision-making method to guide managers in taking a proper decision about six sigma project selection.…”
Section: Evaluation Framework and Methods For Six Sigma Project Selecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The comparison matrix of the criteria in Table 1 is then used to calculate the weights of this matrix using Equation (3). Furthermore, we used Equations (4) and (5) to perform the consistency checks (Wu et al, 2009). CI and CR of the aggregate pairwise comparison matrix provided by the 13 experts are below 0.10, indicating a satisfactory degree of consistency (Saaty, 1980).…”
Section: The Application Of Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP has been widely implemented in banks (e.g. Haghighi et al, 2010), manufacturing systems (Yang et al, 2009), drugs selection (Vidal et al, 2010), site selection (Önüt et al, 2010), software evaluation (Chang et al, 2009), evaluation of website performance (Liu and Chen, 2009), strategy selection (Chen and Wang, 2010;Wu et al, 2009), supplier selection (Chamodrakas et al, 2010), etc. A recent study of the use of AHP specifically in the context of the security assessment of high-speed railways appears in Setola et al (2017).…”
Section: Background Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related to AHP application have focused some reviews marketing (Wind and Saaty, 1980;Mark 2001), energy (Pohekar and Ramachandran, 2004), medical and health care decision making (Liberatore and Nydick, 2008), research and development (R&D) project selection and resource allocation (Heidenberger and Stummer, 1999), banks (Secme et al, 2009;Haghighi et. al., 2010), strategy selection (Li and Li, 2009;Limam et al, 2009;Wu et al, 2009;Chen and Wang, 2010).…”
Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%