1996
DOI: 10.1080/15458830.1996.11770752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selection of the Optimal Precision Level and Target Value for a Production Process: The Lower-Specification-Limit Case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…and ϕ(.) represent the cumulative distribution and probability density functions of the standard normal distribution, respectively [9]. Using the following identity,…”
Section: Study Of Customer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and ϕ(.) represent the cumulative distribution and probability density functions of the standard normal distribution, respectively [9]. Using the following identity,…”
Section: Study Of Customer Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsayed and Chen (1993), Arcelus and Rahim (1994), and Teeravaraprug and Cho (2002) proposed models for simultaneously selecting optimum target means of multiple characteristics, such as variable and attribute quality characteristics. Chen and Chung (1996), and Duffuaa and Siddiqui (2003) studied the effects of measurement errors on the process target models. Kim, Cho, and Phillips (2000) and Rahim, Bhadury, and Al-Sultan (2002) proposed a method of simultaneously selecting the economical process mean and the variance for continuous production process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, researchers have utilized two approaches in order to minimize the effect of measurement errors (Kim et al 2007). The first approach deals with the reduction of variability in measurements through the use of more precise measurement devices and/or better-trained operators (Chandra and Schall 1988;Chen and Chung 1996;Tang and Schneider 1988). The second approach is based on the use of guard bands in identifying "good" and "bad" items.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%