2015
DOI: 10.1088/0957-4484/26/45/455304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective exfoliation of single-layer graphene from non-uniform graphene grown on Cu

Abstract: Graphene growth on a copper surface via metal-catalyzed chemical vapor deposition has several advantages in terms of providing high-quality graphene with the potential for scale-up, but the product is usually inhomogeneous due to the inability to control the graphene layer growth. The non-uniform regions strongly affect the reliability of the graphene in practical electronic applications. Herein, we report a novel graphene transfer method that allows for the selective exfoliation of single-layer graphene from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The variability of properties between different Cu foils, and between multiple samples of one Cu foil, demonstrates the need for representative samples with consistent properties to overcome the risk of spurious results. The confirmation of a surface coating on AA-99.8C raises some concern about the use of this foil both with and without significant cleaning procedures [43][44][45].…”
Section: Properties Of Cu Foilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The variability of properties between different Cu foils, and between multiple samples of one Cu foil, demonstrates the need for representative samples with consistent properties to overcome the risk of spurious results. The confirmation of a surface coating on AA-99.8C raises some concern about the use of this foil both with and without significant cleaning procedures [43][44][45].…”
Section: Properties Of Cu Foilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we believe that the differences in the Raman spectra are attributed to the organic residues of the flux at the interface after the reflow process. There have been reports that the organic residues could affect the Raman spectra in previous studies. …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a small piece of single-crystalline monolayer graphene (1 × 1 cm 2 ) serving as a mother substrate for graphene seeds was grown on a Ge(110) substrate. After a Au film was deposited on the as-grown graphene, the Au-deposited graphene was transferred onto a SiO 2 /Si substrate by a clean, dry transfer method. , The transferred Au/graphene was patterned to form an array of 10 μm size dots with 50 μm spacing (Figure b and Supporting Information Figure S2). By using a polymethylsiloxane (PDMS) stamp coated with the thermal-releasable polymer layer, which has arrays of micropillars with a diameter of 30 μm and an interval of 30 μm, the Au/graphene seed arrays with uniform spacing can be selectively picked up and released onto the polycrystalline Pt substrate (Figure c,d).…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Au thin film (40 nm) was deposited on the single-crystalline graphene synthesized on a Ge(110) substrate by a thermal evaporator. The Au-deposited graphene was mechanically exfoliated from Ge(110) and transferred on the SiO 2 /Si substrate by dry transfer. , The seed patterning was performed using a photoresist (PR, AZ1514E) coating, prebaking (95 °C, 1 min), UV exposure, development (MF319, 90 s), a DI rinse, and postbaking (100 °C, 1 min) processes. To define the seed array structure, the exposed Au thin film and underlying graphene were then etched using KI/I 2 solution and oxygen plasma (10 min, 100 sccm, 100 W), respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%