2009
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2009.2026689
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selective Maintenance Decision-Making Over Extended Planning Horizons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 to find the optimal reliability of the system at state b = 3. The vector of component's state at the time of exiting the maintenance depot is X ¼ 4 0 4 3 3 1 3 ½ , that is, we select to repair components 1 and 3 in subsystem 1 to state 4, components (2, 1), (2,2) and (2,4) in subsystem 2 to state 3, do nothing to components (1,2) and (2,3). We also solve the SM model for the case that there is no benefit of repairing multiple components.…”
Section: Solution Approach and Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…5 to find the optimal reliability of the system at state b = 3. The vector of component's state at the time of exiting the maintenance depot is X ¼ 4 0 4 3 3 1 3 ½ , that is, we select to repair components 1 and 3 in subsystem 1 to state 4, components (2, 1), (2,2) and (2,4) in subsystem 2 to state 3, do nothing to components (1,2) and (2,3). We also solve the SM model for the case that there is no benefit of repairing multiple components.…”
Section: Solution Approach and Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When there is no benefit of repairing multiple components, we restore 4 components (1, 1), (1,3), (2,1), (2,4) to an intermediate state 3 and do nothing to other 3 components (2, 2), (1, 2), (2, 3), while components (1, 1), (1,3) can be maintained to the highest state (perfect functioning state) and another maintenance action can be performed on component (2, 2) (from state 2 to state 3) if the benefits of repairing multiple components are considered. Consequently, a significantly higher system reliability at level 3 can be achieved, R s (3) = 0.945, and the resources utilization is also higher by 18.8 cost units and 14.6 time units when considering the advantages of repairing multiple components simultaneously.…”
Section: Solution Approach and Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, since the system is required to perform a sequence of missions, while requiring short development schedules and very high reliability, it becomes increasingly important to develop appropriate approaches to manage selective maintenance decisions when the planning horizon considers more than a single mission. In (Maillart, Cassady, Rainwater, and Schneider 2005), the authors consider a series-parallel system where each subsystem is composed of identical components whose time to failure is exponentially distributed. The system is assumed to operate a sequence of identical missions such that breaks between two successive missions are of equal durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical experiments are conducted to perform and compare the results obtained for three maintenance optimization problems. Nevertheless, the approach proposed in (Maillart, Cassady, Rainwater, and Schneider 2005), merely relies on a series-parallel system with few subsystems each composed of iid components. Furthermore, replacement of failed components is the only available maintenance action, missions are of identical time interval and breaks are also of identical durations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%