1996
DOI: 10.1139/b96-196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self- and cross-incompatibility in Asparagus officinalis and Asparagus densiflorus cv. Sprengeri

Abstract: Garden asparagus, Asparagus officinalis L. (off), is dioecious and reproductively isolated from a related ornamental, monoecious Asparagus densiflorus (Kunth) Jessop cv. Sprengeri (spr). Since the latter is a potentially valuable source of germplasm, a study was initiated to identify hybridization barriers. Intra-and inter-specific crosses were made using 32 plants of two commercial cultivars of off and 17 plants of three introductions of spr. Part of the pollinated pistils were fixed and examined via fluoresc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Camadro and Peloquin (1981) proposed a genetic model with dominant CI genes in styles that prevent fertilization by pollen carrying specific dominant complementary genes. This model, which assumes segregation for both type of loci, accounts for the results of both UI and BI incompatibility in inter-and intraspecific crosses in tuber-bearing Solanum and also accommodates the results obtained in similar crosses in Asparagus between species that do not possess a selfincompatibility system (Marcellán and Camadro 1996). A few genes are similarly involved in cross-incompatibility reactions in maize.…”
Section: Interspecific Pollen-pistil Incompatibility Barriersmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Camadro and Peloquin (1981) proposed a genetic model with dominant CI genes in styles that prevent fertilization by pollen carrying specific dominant complementary genes. This model, which assumes segregation for both type of loci, accounts for the results of both UI and BI incompatibility in inter-and intraspecific crosses in tuber-bearing Solanum and also accommodates the results obtained in similar crosses in Asparagus between species that do not possess a selfincompatibility system (Marcellán and Camadro 1996). A few genes are similarly involved in cross-incompatibility reactions in maize.…”
Section: Interspecific Pollen-pistil Incompatibility Barriersmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…These results suggest that even in the absence of any other internal barriers (e.g. cross-incompatibility, see Marcellan & Camadro, 1996) gene-flow from diploid A. officinalis into tetraploid A. prostratus via the direct production of tetraploid zygotes (which, if they survived to produce plants, might then be able to interbreed with normal tetraploid A. prostratus) is likely to be very severely restricted by a very low frequency of successful tetraploid zygote formation. It should be remembered that as commercial asparagus growers try to eliminate females from cropping fields because of their lower yield of shoots, transfer of male A. officinalis pollen to female A. prostratus is likely to be overwhelmingly the most frequent in situations where cross-pollination between a commercial asparagus crop and a wild stand of A. prostratus may occur.…”
Section: Relationship Of a Prostratus Tomentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, there are many exceptions, such as the finding of compatibility in SI x SC crosses (see Eijlander et al 2000), and incompatibility in other SC -SI combinations (Hermsen and Ramanna 1976;Camadro and Peloquin 1981;de Nettancourt 2001;Hayes et al 2005;Baek et al 2015). The "SI x SC" rule fails to explain bilateral CI; moreover, CI has been reported in allogamous species without a GSI S-locus system such as maize Evans 2005, 2010) and carrot (Ibañez and Camadro 2015), and in a dioecious species, garden asparagus (Marcellán and Camadro 1996).…”
Section: Cross-incompatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%