2018
DOI: 10.1088/1757-899x/301/1/012155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-optimizing Pitch Control for Large Scale Wind Turbine Based on ADRC

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…By arranging a reasonable transition process, the generalized differential signal is extracted, and the overshoot caused by the excessive initial error is eliminated, thereby obtaining a smooth input signal. The differentiator of second-order nonlinear system is as follows [33].…”
Section: ) Design Of Tracking Differentiatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By arranging a reasonable transition process, the generalized differential signal is extracted, and the overshoot caused by the excessive initial error is eliminated, thereby obtaining a smooth input signal. The differentiator of second-order nonlinear system is as follows [33].…”
Section: ) Design Of Tracking Differentiatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also reported that reduction in pitch activity was achieved when information about the future wind disturbance was included in the optimal control theory. A self-optimizing pitch control method based on the active-disturbance-rejection control theory is proposed by [48] to regulate the amplification coefficient automatically and keep the variation of pitch rate and rotor speed in proper ranges. Novel PI and PID based pitch control techniques have been proposed by [49] by synthesizing the optimization for PI parameters tuning, the estimation for unknown delay-perturbations, and the compensation for removing effects from delay-perturbations to actual outputs in wind turbine pitch control systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Esta variação pode ocorrer por vários motivos: envelhecimento de componentes, mudança de características estruturais durante sua operação, variação de massa/carga, falta de conhecimento exato dos valores, por imperfeições na modelagem, dentre outras. Neste contexto, várias estratégias de controle robusto têm sido reportadas na literatura para solucionar o problema, com garantidas propriedades de estabilidade e convergência em malha fechada (Wu et al, 2018;Xia et al, 2018;Patelski and Dutkiewicz, 2020). O método de Controle com Rejeição Ativa de Distúrbios (do inglês, Active Disturbance Rejection Control-ADRC) está entre estas várias estratégias propostas, e será explorada neste artigo sob um paradigma diferenciado da teoria convencional (Madoński et al, 2015;Zuo et al, 2018;Meng et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…A mudança de paradigma ADRC proposta no presente trabalho consiste em modificar a estrutura do ESO para projetar o sinal da lei de controle utilizando apenas umá unica estimativa do observador. Esta característica particular do método proposto contrasta com a abordagem ADRC tradicional, na qual a lei de controleé formada via uma parametrização linear nos estados estimados pelo ESO (Sun et al, 2016b,a;Wu et al, 2018;Xia et al, 2018;Patelski and Dutkiewicz, 2020). Para facilitar o entendimento do método proposto e suas características, este trabalho discute a aplicação do mesmo em plantas de segunda ordem.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified