2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Self-specific priming effect

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in all other studies expertise-related stimuli such as the own face (Pannese and Hirsch, 2010), the own name (Pfister et al, 2012), pictures of athletic jumps (Güldenpenning et al, 2011), chess configurations (Kiesel et al, 2009), and words in the mother tongue (Schoonbaert et al, 2009) were used to demonstrate expertise-related lager congruence effects. In the present study we used drawn pictures of animals as stimuli that can be assumed to be of equal familiarity for VGPs and NVGPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in all other studies expertise-related stimuli such as the own face (Pannese and Hirsch, 2010), the own name (Pfister et al, 2012), pictures of athletic jumps (Güldenpenning et al, 2011), chess configurations (Kiesel et al, 2009), and words in the mother tongue (Schoonbaert et al, 2009) were used to demonstrate expertise-related lager congruence effects. In the present study we used drawn pictures of animals as stimuli that can be assumed to be of equal familiarity for VGPs and NVGPs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditionally, self-recognition is measured using self-other detection tasks, self-other morphing tasks, (where participants stop a video morph between self and other when it looks more like “me”), or masked priming tasks where reaction times are compared between self and other related primes (Bredart, 2004; Devue and Bredart, 2008; Devue et al, 2009; Frassinetti et al, 2008; Heinisch et al, 2011; Keenan et al, 2000; Keenan et al, 1999; Kircher et al, 2001; Pannese and Hirsch, 2010, 2011; Rotshtein et al, 2005; Tsakiris, 2008). All of these methods converge on the notion of a self-bias, with self-stimuli being more salient and processed faster.…”
Section: The Psychological Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextual effects have been known for some time to significantly influence self-recognition. Indeed, self-related primes in one domain can decrease reaction times in self-other recognition tasks in another (Pannese and Hirsch, 2010; Platek et al, 2004). This effect is still apparent when the self-related priming stimuli are masked and therefore not consciously perceived (Pannese and Hirsch, 2011).…”
Section: The Psychological Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, self-related information can also be preferentially identified in the condition of subliminal priming. When primes displayed for 33 ms (peri-liminal), even primes displayed for 17 ms, there was a significant difference only in reaction time of self-target faces, compared to the nonself-target faces (Pannese and Hirsch, 2010). Compared to other-related information, the self-related information also reflected the automatic, unintentional, unconscious, and uncontrolled aspects of attention capture (Alexopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%