1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-8543.00099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Selling the Case for Gender Equality: Deregulation and Equality Bargaining

Abstract: This article explores the implications of deregulation for gender equality. Comparative, outcomes-based analyses suggest that deregulated systems are characterized by inequality. A critical case study of British Gas is used here to evaluate the prospects for equality bargaining, that is the use of voluntary, joint regulation to further equality, in the wake of radical deregulation. Responsibility for equality in the workplace is found to have been privatized. The state as regulator has stood back and managers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
104
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
3
104
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The ruling in the Allen case has implications for the concept of equality bargaining (Colling andDickens, 1989, 1998;Heery, 2006) as it reinforced the legal position that gender pay equality, once uncovered, is non-negotiable. In doing so the ruling made bargained outcomes on equal pay risky for UK trade unions, perhaps forcing them down a legal route.…”
Section: Paradise Lost?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ruling in the Allen case has implications for the concept of equality bargaining (Colling andDickens, 1989, 1998;Heery, 2006) as it reinforced the legal position that gender pay equality, once uncovered, is non-negotiable. In doing so the ruling made bargained outcomes on equal pay risky for UK trade unions, perhaps forcing them down a legal route.…”
Section: Paradise Lost?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, they have acted as additional articulating mechanisms that assist in linking the local and regional levels with national activities. They have, not however, elevated the status of issues of specific concern to women during bargaining (Cyba and Papouschek 1996;Colling and Dickens 1998). Nor have they prevented large numbers of women from leaving unions and citing the inadequacy of union organization as being their prime reason (Waddington and Kerr 1999).…”
Section: Revitalization and National Union Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…3. This in no way diminishes the importance of collective bargaining for gender equality, as evidenced by the fact that women who are represented by a union enjoy better terms and conditions than those who are not (Booth 1995;Colling and Dickens 1998: 393±4). 4.…”
Section: Final Version Accepted 22 December 1999mentioning
confidence: 99%