2007 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics 2007
DOI: 10.1109/icmlc.2007.4370858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantic-Enhanced Personalized Recommender System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobasher, Jin and Zhou have taken advantage of an item ontology, which is part of the schema for a relational database, in order to compute similarity correlations between items [2]. Wang and Kong also use an ontology to calculate the correlations between items, and they use a very similar algorithm to the one we present in this paper; but they do not use the ontology to infer the semantic features, since they explicitly specify them [4]. In [5] and [6], the authors also propose the use of semantic descriptions of items and user profiles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Mobasher, Jin and Zhou have taken advantage of an item ontology, which is part of the schema for a relational database, in order to compute similarity correlations between items [2]. Wang and Kong also use an ontology to calculate the correlations between items, and they use a very similar algorithm to the one we present in this paper; but they do not use the ontology to infer the semantic features, since they explicitly specify them [4]. In [5] and [6], the authors also propose the use of semantic descriptions of items and user profiles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Regarding existing semantics-based collaborative (and hybrid) systems [33,13,29,40], their recommendations were not compared against ours because their philosophies are essentially different. Specifically, some recommendations selected by collaborative approaches would go unnoticed to our strategy (because we do not consider the profiles of other users), and vice versa (because existing approaches disregard the relationships discovered by our semantic reasoning techniques).…”
Section: Preliminary Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In order to fight overspecialization, researchers devised collaborative filtering [36,25,29] -whose basic idea is to move beyond the experience of an individual user's profile and instead draw on the experiences of a community of like-minded users (his/her neighbors), and even they combined content-based and collaborative filtering in hybrid approaches [6,22,33,13,40]. Even though collaborative (and hybrid) approaches mitigate the effects of overspecialization by considering the interests of other users, they bring in new limitations, such as the sparsity problem (related to difficulties to select each individual's neighborhood when the knowledge about the users' preferences is sparse), privacy concerns bound to the confidentiality of the users' personal data, and scalability problems stemmed from the management of many user profiles (instead of just one profile like in content-based approaches).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these implicit and explicit ratings do not consider the attributes of an item. Without taking these attributes into account, the recommendation generated cannot be guaranteed (Montiel and Montes, 2009;Wang and Kong, 2007;Blanco-Fernández et al, 2008). On the other hand, semantic information about an item consists of the attributes of INTR 20,3 the item, the relationship of the item to other items, and other meta-information.…”
Section: A Product Semantic Relevance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%