2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-05290-3_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Semantically Enhanced Recommender Systems

Abstract: Abstract. Recommender Systems have become a significant area in the context of web personalization, given the large amount of available data. Ontologies can be widely taken advantage of in recommender systems, since they provide a means of classifying and discovering of new information about the items to recommend, about user profiles and even about their context. We have developed a semantically enhanced recommender system based on this kind of ontologies. In this paper we present a description of the propose… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Classical CF‐based RS generate recommendations based on implicit and explicit ratings of items, which do not consider the attributes of an item. Without taking these attributes into account, the recommendations generated cannot be guaranteed (Wong and Kong 2007; Yolanda et al 2008; Ruiz‐Montiel and Aldana‐Montes 2009). Semantic information about an item consists of the attributes of the item, the relationship between items, and the relationship between items and meta‐information (Resnik 1995; Guo and Lu 2007).…”
Section: The Semantic Relevance Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classical CF‐based RS generate recommendations based on implicit and explicit ratings of items, which do not consider the attributes of an item. Without taking these attributes into account, the recommendations generated cannot be guaranteed (Wong and Kong 2007; Yolanda et al 2008; Ruiz‐Montiel and Aldana‐Montes 2009). Semantic information about an item consists of the attributes of the item, the relationship between items, and the relationship between items and meta‐information (Resnik 1995; Guo and Lu 2007).…”
Section: The Semantic Relevance Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical recommendation approaches present obstacles in providing recommendations according to these sections of business product categories. Thus, we need to deal with the semantic features of the product categories in the recommendation process, which cannot be well handled in classical CF‐based recommendation approaches (Wong and Kong 2007; Ruiz‐Montiel and Aldana‐Montes 2009). Another obstacle in the application of RS is the great variety of representations of information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these implicit and explicit ratings do not consider the attributes of an item. Without taking these attributes into account, the recommendation generated cannot be guaranteed (Montiel and Montes, 2009;Wang and Kong, 2007;Blanco-Fernández et al, 2008). On the other hand, semantic information about an item consists of the attributes of INTR 20,3 the item, the relationship of the item to other items, and other meta-information.…”
Section: A Product Semantic Relevance Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fuzzy type 1 and fuzzy type 2to tackle vagueness [4], [29]. This emphasises the important role of ontologies in the development of knowledge based system which describes semantic relationships among entities [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%