Semi-automated detection of looting in Afghanistan using multispectral imagery and principal component analysis

Lauricella, Anthony J.; Cannon, Joshua; Branting, Scott; Hammer, Emily

doi:10.15184/aqy.2017.90

Cited by 37 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The project has undertaken initial change identification for incidents such as looting, bomb damage, and collapsed heritage, with the primary goal of prioritizing new images for analysts' attention based on the likelihood that a new image contains evidence of such events. This would help to mitigate the bottleneck created by the quantity of imagery in relation to the numbers of analysts (limited by cost factors) and is in line with similar work being undertaken by archaeologists elsewhere in the world [38][39][40].…”

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 53%

The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery

Danti¹,

Branting

2017

Geosciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives (ASOR CHI) continues to address the cultural heritage crisis in Syria and Northern Iraq by: (1) monitoring, reporting, and fact-finding; (2) promoting global awareness; and (3) conducting emergency response projects and developing post-conflict rehabilitation plans. As part of this mission, ASOR CHI, through a public-government collaboration with the United States of America (US) Department of State, has been provided with access to hundreds of thousands of satellite images, some within 24 h of the image being taken, in order to assess reports of damage to cultural heritage sites, to discover unreported damage, and to evaluate the impacts of such incidents. This work is being done across an inventory of over 13,000 cultural heritage sites in the affected regions. The available dataset of satellite imagery is significantly larger than the scales that geospatial specialists within archaeology have dealt with in the past. This has necessitated a rethinking of how the project uses satellite imagery and how ASOR CHI and future projects can more effectively undertake the important work of cultural heritage monitoring and damage assessment.

show abstract

Section: Introductionsupporting

confidence: 53%

The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery

Danti¹,

Branting

2017

Geosciences

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other programs have sought to preserve specific historic sites and to perform rescue excavations at Mes Aynak in Logar Province [11,38,53,54,60,61]. Previous work by our team used novel semi-automated methods to investigate the scale of looting at the site of Ai Khanoum [62].…”

Section: After the American Invasion (2001-present)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Remote assessments of the archaeological heritage situation in Afghanistan

Hammer

Seifried²,

Franklin

et al. 2018

Journal of Cultural Heritage

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analysis of spatial and temporal patterns in looting and destruction at archaeological sites using satellite imagery has become a focus of multiple research groups working on cultural heritage in conflict zones, especially in areas controlled by the Islamic State in Syria and Iraq. In this paper, we apply similar methods to investigate looting and destruction at archaeological sites in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan, where Taliban-related cultural heritage destruction events have also frequently made international headlines. Using the time depth provided by high-resolution, time-stamped DigitalGlobe satellite and BuckEye aerial images as well as CORONA and other historical satellite images and maps, we quantitatively document spatial and temporal patterns in destruction from looting, agricultural activity, military occupation, urban growth, mining, and other kinds of development at over 1000 previously known archaeological sites across Afghanistan. This analysis indicates that several common narratives about cultural heritage destruction in Afghanistan may require revision. Specifically, we conclude that significant amounts of systematic looting of archaeological sites in Afghanistan already occurred before Taliban-related conflicts, that there has been little increase in systematic looting in Talibancontrolled areas post-2001, and that the most pressing threats to Afghanistan's heritage sites come from development activities, including agricultural expansion, urban growth, and future mining. The analysis demonstrates that the situation in Afghanistan both parallels and contrasts with that seen in the post-Arab-Spring Middle East.

show abstract

“…Meanwhile, intentional and often politically motivated destruction of archaeological sites is being carried out at a horrifying rate (Al‐Houdalieh, Bernbeck, and Pollock ; Bsheer ; De Cesari ; Khalidi ; Lauricella et al. ; Peutz ; Rabbat ; Salah Hussein and Saleh Ali ; Veyne ). Climate change is also imposing a severe toll on the survival of the archaeological record (Hambrecht and Rockman ).…”

Section: Archaeological Fragmentation?mentioning

confidence: 99%

Finding Archaeology in 2017: What Is Archaeology and Why Are We Doing It? Why Should We Be Doing It?

Lewis

2018

American Anthropologist

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

These annual review essays focus on what we as archaeologists are doing year by year. Many themes continue on from review to review, waxing and waning, not unlike the bell curves of a traditional pottery seriation.Each year, themes are highlighted and presented in varied ways according to the orientation and aims of the reviewer. All do a masterful job of curating the vast range of what archaeologists were, in each annual period, currently producing. My review follows in the footsteps of its predecessors, summarizing an array of new and exciting research, and describing how agendas presented in 2017 cluster around sets of related questions and aims. It will also look at the growing literature that asks, in one way or another, fundamental questions about what archaeology really is and why we pursue it. In this time when the value of academic pursuits and scientific perspectives are being highly scrutinized in politics and popular culture, archaeologists are faced with the uncomfortable question of "What is it, really, that we should be doing?" [archaeology, current issues, public archaeology, digital archaeology] RESUMEN Estos ensayos de revisión anual se enfocan en lo que como arqueólogos estamos haciendo año tras año. Muchos temas continúan de revisión en revisión, creciendo o menguando, no muy diferente de las curvas en forma de campana de la seriación de la cerámica tradicional. Cada año, temas son enfatizados y presentados de varias maneras de acuerdo a la orientación y metas del crítico. Todos hacen un trabajo magistral de organizar un rango vasto de lo que los arqueólogos estaban, en cada período anual, realmente produciendo. Mi revisión sigue los pasos de sus predecesores, resumiendo una colección de nueva y emocionante investigación, y describiendo cómo las agendas presentadas en el 2017 se agrupan alrededor de juegos de cuestiones y metas relacionadas.También examina la creciente literatura que pregunta, de una manera u otra, cuestiones fundamentales acerca de lo que la arqueología realmente es y por qué nos dedicamos a ella. En este tiempo cuando el valor de los empeños académicos y las perspectivas científicas están siendo altamente escrutados en política y cultura popular, los arqueólogos se enfrentan a la pregunta incomoda de "¿Qué es lo que realmente deberíamos estar haciendo?"[arqueología, cuestiones actuales, arqueología pública, arqueología digital] ARCHAEOLOGICAL FRAGMENTATION?While the theme of what such a diverse discipline should be subtly undergirds much of the literature, a number of 2017 articles, each in a very different way, directly address the very nature of what archaeology is and why we practice it. In the Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, Assaf Nativ (2017, 55) asks us to reconsider our notions of the

show abstract

Semi-automated detection of looting in Afghanistan using multispectral imagery and principal component analysis

Abstract: Abstract

Cited by 37 publications

References 19 publications

The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery

The American Schools of Oriental Research Cultural Heritage Initiatives: Monitoring Cultural Heritage in Syria and Northern Iraq by Geospatial Imagery

Remote assessments of the archaeological heritage situation in Afghanistan

Finding Archaeology in 2017: What Is Archaeology and Why Are We Doing It? Why Should We Be Doing It?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About