Sensitivitas Hakim Terhadap Perlindungan Nafkah Isteri Pasca Perceraian

Mansari, Mansari; Moriyanti, Moriyanti

doi:10.22373/equality.v5i1.5377

Cited by 6 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Dampak dari perceraian tersebut timbul persoalan hukum seperti pengasuhan anak, nafkah anak, nafkah istri (mut'ah, nafkah madliyyah, nafkah iddah), dan harta bersama. Nafkah istri yang belum diberikan oleh suami semasa perkawinan menjadi hak istri dan istri dapat menuntut kembali di pengadilan (Mansari and Moriyanti 2019). Kewajiban memberi nafkah disebabkan adanya ikatan perkawinan, adanya akad nikah menjadikan istri mempunyai ikatan dengan suaminya, membesarkan anak serta membangun keluarga Bersama (Abdullah 2017;Bahri 2015).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Nafkah yang tidak diberikan suami kepada istrinya akan menjadi utang meskipun perkawinan mereka telah putus. Berpisah tempat tinggal antara suami dan istri selama keduanya masih dalam ikatan perkawinan tidak menjadikan gugurnya pemberian nafkah oleh suami terhadap istri (Mansari and Moriyanti 2019).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Undang-udang Nomor 1 tahun 1974 Pasal 41 huruf C memberi kewenangan kepada hakim untuk memberi beban kepada suami dalam memenuhi nafkah kepada istri pasca perceraian. Hak istri untuk mendapatkan nafkah tersebut akan secara efektif terealisasi apabila didukung oleh putusan hakim yang menerapkan aturan dari undang-undang perkawinan tersebut, selain itu hakim juga mempunyai sensitivitas yang tinggi terhadap perlindungan hak-hak perempuan (Mansari and Moriyanti 2019).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

“…Oleh karenanya, hakim mempunyai peran strategis dalam mewujudkan hak perempuan pasca perceraian melalui kewenangan yang dimilikinya. Bentuk peran yang dilakukan oleh hakim dalam mewujudkan hak perempuan pasca perceraian adalah dengan memberikan putusan berdasarkan nilainilai keadilan (Mansari and Moriyanti 2019).…”

Section: Progresivitas Hakim Dalam Menentukan Beban Suami Kepada Istr...unclassified

See 3 more Smart Citations

Progresivitas Hakim dalam Menentukan Beban Akibat Perceraian Bagi Suami Kepada Istri Pasca Perceraian

Anwar

2021

AJISH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

There are variation of Judges in determining husband’s obligatory burden toward their wives due to divorce because there is no provision which specially regulate every Judges to determine the amount of the sustenance post divorce. this article describe about how the progression of judges in determining the obligatory burden due to divorce for the husband toward their ex wives. this is a literature study which take the source from Directory of Supreme Court Decision in the First, Appeal and Cassation Level. this study will describe about how the judges in Religious Justice Agency especially Supreme Court in making effort to protect women’s rights post divorce. this sutdy will analyze about Judges’ decision which charge the husbands to fulfill their obligation toward their ex wives in the form of Iddah, Madliyyah and Mut’ah living. the next discussion is about how the judges apply the progressive law through their decision that is, obligation which is charged to the husband in fulfilling their ex wives’ rights post divorce. Hakim dalam menentukan beban terhadap suami kepada istri akibat perceraian bervariatif dan belum ada ketentuan khusus yang mengatur secara rinci bagi hakim dalam menentukan besar kecilnya besaran nafkah pasca perceraian. Artikel ini menguraikan tentang bagaimana progresifitas hakim dalam menetapkan beban akibat perceraian bagi suami terhadap istri yang diceraikan. Tulisan ini bersifat literer yang bersumber dari Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung pada Tingkat Pertama, Tingkat banding, dan Tingkat Kasasi. Tulisan ini akan menguraikan tentang bagaimana hakim pada badan Peradilan Agama khususnya Mahkamah Agung dalam melakukan upaya melindungi hak-hak perempuan pasca perceraian. Tulisan ini akan menganalisa tentang putusan hakim yang membebankan suami untuk memenuhi kewajiban kepada istri berupa pembayaran nafkah iddah, nafkah madliyyah, dan mut’ah. Pembahasan selanjutnya tentang bagaimana hakim telah menerapkan hukum progresif melalui putusannya yaitu, kewajiban yang dibebankan hakim kepada suami dalam hal pemenuhan hak istri pasca perceraian.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Section: Progresivitas Hakim Dalam Menentukan Beban Suami Kepada Istr...unclassified

See 2 more Smart Citations

Progresivitas Hakim dalam Menentukan Beban Akibat Perceraian Bagi Suami Kepada Istri Pasca Perceraian

Anwar

2021

AJISH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several researchers are focusing on women's rights in the Religious Courts, such as Suadi (2018), Mansari andMoriyati (2019), Fikhria (2018) in his study, Suadi emphasized the role of the Religious Courts in protecting the rights of women and children through a decision referring to PERMA No. 3 of 2017, while Fakhria focused on the difference in the number of rights obtained by wives in talaq and lawsuit divorces.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The use of ex officio to fulfill women's post-divorce rights at the Samarinda Religious Court

Yuni

2021

Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Problems in fulfilling women's rights after divorce in Religious Courts still exist due to the weakness of supporting elements for the court decisions and their procedures, and obstacles from the ex-couples. Therefore, religious judges are expected to have sensitivity and support for women in making decisions with the value of justice, legal certainty, and benefit. This normative juridical study used statutory and conceptual approaches to explain the use of ex officio in fulfilling iddah and mut'ah living in the Samarinda Religious Court and its suitability to legal purposes. A literary study was done in collecting data by compiling secondary data related to the theme. Then, the data were analyzed using the qualitative descriptive method. Ex officio discourses and legal objectives theory were used to analyze the raised issues. Fulfilling iddah and mut'ah living through ex officio at the Samarinda Religious Court in talaq divorces refers to Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) No. 3 of 2017, and Circular Letter of Supreme Court (SEMA) No. 1 of 2017. Meanwhile, the application of ex officio in lawsuit divorces refers to PERMA No. 3 of 2017 and SEMA No. 2 of 2019. The fulfillment of women's rights after divorce at the Religious Courts through ex officio aligns with legal objectives: legal certainty, justice, and benefit.

show abstract

The Judges’ Legal Consideration on Divorce of Nushūz Cases at the Kupang High Religious Court: Gender Perspective

Fitriyani,

Saepuddin Jahar,

Subhan

et al. 2023

SAMARAH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The gender sensitivity of judges towards women in court is crucial to ensure that judgments provide a sense of justice and accommodate the rights of wives after divorce. This article aims to analyze judges' considerations from philosophical, juridical, and sociological aspects in divorce judgments due to nushūz (disobedience) from a gender perspective, addressing two main questions: 1) how judges use a gender perspective in deciding divorce cases due to nushūz, and 2) what factors influence judges' decisions in divorce cases due to nushūz from a gender perspective. This research employs qualitative research methods, which is a case study design, with juridical and gender approaches. The primary data source is derived from the rulings of the Religious High Court of Kupang No. 009/Pdt.G/2015/PTA.Kp obtained from the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia's website, and judge interviews as supporting data, which were analyzed using content analysis. The research findings indicate that from a gender perspective, judges exhibit gender bias in categorizing nushūz as if nushūz can only be committed by wives, whereas nushūz can be committed by both husbands and wives. Judges' interpretations of nushūz are still influenced by the content of the law, the culture of the law, and its structure of the law. This study implies that judges should undergo gender-based training or workshops organized by judicial institutions or universities to enhance their gender sensitivity in deciding legal cases, especially nushūz cases.

show abstract

Sensitivitas Hakim Terhadap Perlindungan Nafkah Isteri Pasca Perceraian

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Progresivitas Hakim dalam Menentukan Beban Akibat Perceraian Bagi Suami Kepada Istri Pasca Perceraian

Progresivitas Hakim dalam Menentukan Beban Akibat Perceraian Bagi Suami Kepada Istri Pasca Perceraian

The use of ex officio to fulfill women's post-divorce rights at the Samarinda Religious Court

The Judges’ Legal Consideration on Divorce of Nushūz Cases at the Kupang High Religious Court: Gender Perspective

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About