2018
DOI: 10.3390/w10030253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity Analysis of the Surface Runoff Coefficient of HiPIMS in Simulating Flood Processes in a Large Basin

Abstract: To simulate flood processes at the basin level, the GPU-based High-Performance Integrated Hydrodynamic Modelling System (HiPIMS) is gaining interest as computational capability increases. However, the difficulty of coping with rainfall input to HiPIMS reduces the possibility of acquiring a satisfactory simulation accuracy. The objective of this study is to test the sensitivity of the surface runoff coefficient in the HiPIMS source term in the Misai basin with an area of 797 km 2 in south China. To achieve this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies investigated the potential of integrating hydraulic roughness in the form of Manning's n and remote sensing data to quantify river discharge [17,22,23]. However, commonly they assigned the Manning's roughness coefficient based on land-cover/land-use class types interpreted from remote sensing [24][25][26]. Due to the high influence of vegetation on runoff generation, various remote sensing methods were developed to estimate hydraulic roughness over humid environments using remote sensing, such as using multispectral-based vegetation indices or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [17,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies investigated the potential of integrating hydraulic roughness in the form of Manning's n and remote sensing data to quantify river discharge [17,22,23]. However, commonly they assigned the Manning's roughness coefficient based on land-cover/land-use class types interpreted from remote sensing [24][25][26]. Due to the high influence of vegetation on runoff generation, various remote sensing methods were developed to estimate hydraulic roughness over humid environments using remote sensing, such as using multispectral-based vegetation indices or light detection and ranging (LiDAR) [17,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models responded differently to extremely high and extremely low flows. Therefore, the responses of the models to different conditions [39][40][41] We also plotted flow duration curves (FDCs) in Figure 4 to evaluate the agreement between observations and simulations. Both the XAJ and SWAT models overestimated extreme high flows (<1% exceedance) during calibration and validation periods, and it was further obvious in the SWAT model.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models responded differently to extremely high and extremely low flows. Therefore, the responses of the models to different conditions [39][40][41] need further study. Table 5 summarizes the statistical performance measures for runoff, peak flow and occurrence time of peak flow.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where ∆t is the duration when the flow of the i-th grid reaches the outlet of the corresponding sub-basin (the value is an integer) (s); L is the ground flow length (m); n is the roughness (the values of different land use types are derived from some references and are shown in Table 4 [37,38]); i c is the net rain intensity (m/s); and S l is the slope. According to the above formula, the surface runoff in each period through the outlets of the sub-basin was calculated as follows:…”
Section: Water Quantity Modulementioning
confidence: 99%