2009
DOI: 10.1292/jvms.001673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity for the Detection of a Clonally Rearranged Antigen Receptor Gene in Endoscopically Obtained Biopsy Specimens from Canine Alimentary Lymphoma

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Canine alimentary lymphoma is currently diagnosed on the basis of findings of cytological or histopathological examination. However, it is often difficult to histopathologically distinguish alimentary lymphoma from lymphocytic-plasmacytic enteritis. Recently, the application of polymerase chain reaction for antigen receptor gene rearrangement (PARR) has been reported. In the present study, we assess the sensitivity of PARR analysis in diagnosing canine alimentary lymphoma using endoscopically obtaine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sensitivity of PARR for detecting clonal cell proliferations was lower than what has been published for other types of canine lymphoma 8 but higher than previously reported by others (66.7%) for canine intestinal lymphoma. 22 The increase in sensitivity in our study may be due to the use of capillary electrophoresis rather than a polyacrylamide gel, leading to an increased resolution and thereby sensitivity. We performed PARR testing in duplicate to ensure that no single bands representing pseudoclones were misinterpreted as a clonal cell population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The sensitivity of PARR for detecting clonal cell proliferations was lower than what has been published for other types of canine lymphoma 8 but higher than previously reported by others (66.7%) for canine intestinal lymphoma. 22 The increase in sensitivity in our study may be due to the use of capillary electrophoresis rather than a polyacrylamide gel, leading to an increased resolution and thereby sensitivity. We performed PARR testing in duplicate to ensure that no single bands representing pseudoclones were misinterpreted as a clonal cell population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Based on careful histological review of morphology and immunophenotype results, the 2 polyclonal cases in this study could be interpreted as false-negative results. Given that severe infiltration of inflammatory lymphocytes concomitant with small cell intestinal lymphoma has been reported in cats with the same disease(17), this is the most likely cause of the false-negative result, leading to a decrease in the relative number of tumor cells present which may fall below the PCR detection limit(37,38). Other possible explanations for the 2 polyclonal results is unknown mutations in the variable (V) and joining (J) segments or lack of primer coverage of unknown V and J segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PCR testing for clonal rearrangement of lymphocyte antigen was performed for 8 dogs in the Shiba group, and TCR gene clonal rearrangement was detected in 2 dogs. As the sensitivity and specificity of PCR testing are reportedly questionable to some extent for detecting alimentary lymphoma [9,17], there is some possibility that these were false-positive results. Unfortunately, necropsy could not be conducted on the 2 dogs, and we could not completely exclude the possibility of lymphoma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%