2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity matters. Comparing the use of multiple indicators and of a multidimensional poverty index in the evaluation of a poverty eradication program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poverty in developing regions, like sub-Saharan Africa, is seen as a complex multidimensional problem that is difficult to measure (Masset & Garcia-Hombrados, 2021). When Vickery (1977) introduced the concept of time-poverty, her aim was to establish a new construct of poverty that would measure differences between households not only in terms of their income, but also in terms of time availability.…”
Section: Time-poverty Among Smallholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poverty in developing regions, like sub-Saharan Africa, is seen as a complex multidimensional problem that is difficult to measure (Masset & Garcia-Hombrados, 2021). When Vickery (1977) introduced the concept of time-poverty, her aim was to establish a new construct of poverty that would measure differences between households not only in terms of their income, but also in terms of time availability.…”
Section: Time-poverty Among Smallholdersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, Ghana has its indicator known as the Multidimensional Poverty Index (Global MPI). The study of Masset & García-Hombrados (2021) reported that the index made it easier for the Ghanaian government to alleviate poverty.…”
Section: Hdi On Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the objective of the intervention is measured using multiple outcome indicators, then the average impact of the intervention on the sample for each outcome indicator is obtained, while it is also important to understand what is happening at the household level overall, given the synergies that exist between the objectives of the intervention. Furthermore, indices can offer important advantages over single indicators by consolidating heterogeneous information into a single metric for straight comparison across groups and thus eliminates the concern of selective reporting (Masset and Garcia‐Hombrados, 2021) in addition to resolving the issue of increased probability of a type 1 error (a false‐positive finding) when carrying out multiple hypothesis tests (Anderson, 2008). Therefore, given that policymakers in developing countries face strict budget constraints with resources spread thin over households, analysis revealing the effectiveness of interventions in alleviating multiple deprivations of food security and nutrition simultaneously at a household level is thus essential to generate evidence for effective policymaking at the best cost‐effective solution.…”
Section: Outcome Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indices thus summarize heterogenous information into a single metric and enable straight comparisons across groups. Furthermore, by summarizing information, it avoids the statistical issue of multiple hypothesis testing (Anderson, 2008) as well as selective reporting of results (Masset and Garcia‐Hombrados, 2021). Therefore, we combine the different indicators of food security and nutrition to form a nutrition‐sensitive multidimensional poverty index (N‐MPI) following Alkire et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%