2007
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2007.893912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensitivity of LPGs in PCFs Fabricated by an Electric Arc to Temperature, Strain, and External Refractive Index

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5-15 Since Hill et al 1 and Vengsarkar et al 5 wrote the first FBG and LPFG in conventional glass fibers in 1978 and 1996, respectively, the fabrications and applications of in-fiber gratings have achieved rapid developments. Various fabrication methods, such as ultraviolet ͑UV͒ laser exposure, 5-15 CO 2 laser irradiation, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] electricarc discharge, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] femtosecond laser exposure, [38][39][40][41][42][43] mechanical microbends, [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] etched corrugations, [52][53][54][55][56][57] and ion beam implantation, [58][59][60] have been demonstrated to write LPFGs in different types of optical fibers. Numerous LPFGbased devices have ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5-15 Since Hill et al 1 and Vengsarkar et al 5 wrote the first FBG and LPFG in conventional glass fibers in 1978 and 1996, respectively, the fabrications and applications of in-fiber gratings have achieved rapid developments. Various fabrication methods, such as ultraviolet ͑UV͒ laser exposure, 5-15 CO 2 laser irradiation, [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] electricarc discharge, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] femtosecond laser exposure, [38][39][40][41][42][43] mechanical microbends, [44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] etched corrugations, [52][53][54][55][56][57] and ion beam implantation, [58][59][60] have been demonstrated to write LPFGs in different types of optical fibers. Numerous LPFGbased devices have ...…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical result for the sensitivity of -1.85 nm/mε differs from the measured value by 11%, which is better than the error of the semi-analytical result of nearly 25%. Along with the experimental error of 2.4%, the discrepancy between the theoretical and experimental results can be attributed to several neglected effects: inhomogeneous distribution of strain in the PCF caused by the presence of air holes, change in the geometry of the fibre profile due to strain, dispersion of the strain-optic coefficients and the neglected average change in the refractive index of the grating, (Petrovic et al, 2007 a).…”
Section: Grating Spectrum and Resonant Modesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this respect, the rapidly evolving field of optical fiber sensing seems to hold a strong potential for providing effective solutions towards accurately measuring and monitoring pressure, strain and shear between the human skin and the support surface [3], [5]. Sensing by means of light offers a number of advantages when utilizing the appropriate fiber sensor configuration, since light propagation is highly sensitive to external forces and perturbations yielding real-time measurements with almost negligible hysteresis [6]- [8].…”
Section: Background and Motivementioning
confidence: 99%