2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2015.7353870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sensorless friction-compensated passive lead-through programming for industrial robots

Abstract: Abstract-Industrial robots are important when the degree of automation in industry is increased. To enable the use of robots also when the products change rapidly, the programming must be quick and easy to perform. One way to accomplish this is to use lead-through programming, i.e., the user manually guides the robot. This paper presents a sensorless approach, and thus avoids the need for a typically expensive sensor. The method is based on disabling low-level joint controllers combined with gravity compensati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of the dithering torque at zerovelocity has been illustrated. Secondly, we present an example illustrating the functionality of the active LTP proposed in this article, and finally a comparison between our active LTP and a passive LTP [8] is presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The importance of the dithering torque at zerovelocity has been illustrated. Secondly, we present an example illustrating the functionality of the active LTP proposed in this article, and finally a comparison between our active LTP and a passive LTP [8] is presented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The friction compensation torque has been calculated similarly to [8], based on the friction model presented in Sec. II-B.…”
Section: B Friction Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [14] a control strategy was proposed without joint friction model identification, although a feed-forward term for partial friction compensation could be added. It was noticed that with such a method the force required to move larger robots becomes too large for human operators, thus the approach is not general.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent works proposed improvements on joint torque and external forces estimation, while the joints were not moving [3], or were moving at very low velocities [4]. The presented methods accounted for the significant torque disturbances due to static, Coulomb and viscous friction, modeling them either as a deterministic affine function [5], either as a uniformly distributed noise, with a range (the Coulomb "friction band") dependent on the velocity, combined to a Gaussian noise of zero mean, with a variance increasing with joint velocity [4]. In both cases, the respective parameters were identified manually and few details were given on the procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%